User:PopitTart: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(move to sandbox)
Line 258: Line 258:


===Current discussion open===
===Current discussion open===
* [[Wonder Piranha|Wonder Piranha Plant/Wonder Piranha]]


===Probably worth changing as-is?===
===Probably worth changing as-is?===
Line 269: Line 268:


===Confident but to be discussed===
===Confident but to be discussed===
* [[Disaster Neko|Disaster Cat]]
* [[Neko Parent|Cat Parent]]
* [[Robo Kikki]] - the base form is named ''Monkikki'', is this considered an intended name difference or a filename shortening?
* [[Slave Basa]] - the base form is named ''Basabasa'', same as above


===uh oh, name overlap?===
===uh oh, name overlap?===
* [[Senchō Kinopio]] - find reliability of ''Senchō'', compare [[Captain Toad]] and [[Sea Captain Toad]].
* [[Prof. Kinopio]] - compare [[Professor Toad]]
* [[Chef Kinopio]] - compare [[Chef Toad]].
* [[Chef Kinopio]] - compare [[Chef Toad]].
* [[? Kinoko]] - compare [[Mystery Mushroom]]
* [[? Kinoko]] - compare [[Mystery Mushroom]]

Revision as of 22:11, February 18, 2025

Rock Pikmin's Spirit sprite from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate
I love those Pikmin

I'm PopitTart. I'm more of a casual here. My focus is on Pikipedia under the same username.

Proposal Draft

When going through the wiki, I often come across pages like Fwoosh that have infoboxes showing their first appearance in a game, and their latest appearance in... a port or remake of that game. Yes, Super Mario 3D All-Stars may literally be the latest release to feature it, but I feel like this misses the point of the inbobox entries. In my mind, it gives a quick look at the history of the subject. Bull's-Eye Blaster being introduced in Super Mario Bros. 3 and appearing in Super Mario Bros. Wonder quickly gives the jist that this is a historic subject that continues to see use today. Meanwhile, Bob-omb Buddy's appearances being Super Mario 64 and Super Mario 3D All-Stars just tells me that it was in 64, despite the extensive history that they actually have.

To remedy this, I propose that these infoboxes should distinguish when the latest appearance is in a reissue. When it is, the box will be split to have the reissue game displayed alongside the subject's most recent original appearance, in a fashion much like non-Super Mario characters list both their latest overall appearance and latest Super Mario appearance. This would have some caveats and nuances.

  1. A reissue should only be noted as such if the subject also appeared in the original game. Triangular Block does not appear in Super Mario Bros. 3, so Super Mario Advance 4 is an original appearance.
  2. Similarly, If a subject appears in new content within a reissue, then the reissue constitutes a new appearance. This would apply to Blockstepper as it appears in Bowser's Fury.
  3. If a subject only appears in a game and its own reissue, then no note is necessary. The original game does not need to be listed twice, much like subjects that are only in one game.


Proposer: PopitTart (talk)
Deadline: N/A

Support: SM64 is not a new game

  1. PopitTart (talk) Per proposal.

Oppose: The latest appearance is the latest appearance

Comments Deluxe HD (Nintendo Switch)

Navbox splitting



Derived Names

Preliminary list of possible derived name discussions to be had.

Current discussion open

Probably worth changing as-is?

Confident but to be discussed

uh oh, name overlap?

Hesitant, discuss

Shy Guy Hell