User talk:Time Turner/Archive 7

Reversinator's pages of talking
In which a story begins, and a plucky user joins the crowd (November 2009 to January 2010)
In which the user makes small talk and small edits across the wiki (January 2010 to February 2010)
In which the user is reprimanded and some explanations are given (February 2010 to March 2010)
In which the user is still budding and finds out the consequences (March 2010 to April 2010)
In which the user realises that his lessons need to be taken to heart (May 2010 to March 2011)
In which the user slaps his face and marches onward (March 2011 to May 2013)
In which the user asks too many questions and receives too many answers (May 2013 to May 2015)
In which the user soars through peaks and dives through valleys (May 2015 to January 2017)
In which the user speaks up, speaks out, and speaks in tongues (January 2017 to August 2017)
In which the user meanders argumentatively through the year (August 2017 to January 2017)

Hello to you all, I'm Time Turner, and if you want to talk to me, I got a couple of rules for you first.

1. Sign all of your comments so I know who left it.
2. Spelling and grammar are prefered.
3. I will reply to you on your talk page.
4. Whenever starting a new conversation, put it under a new header.
5. Just to let you know, I am a fan of numerous genres and forms of media, such as My Little Pony and Doctor Who. If that bothers you in a way that makes you feel the need to attempt to provoke me or otherwise instigate something, we're better off not talking.

re: images

are you using vba-m (presumably vba has the same thing, but i'm not sure myself)? if so, i just highlighted the record cover in the selection menu, opened up the oam viewer, scrolled to where the image was, hit "Save...", and renamed/compressed/uploaded the image - Turboo (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2013 (EDT)

holding down B will make it go faster, but instead of playing through everything, i just downloaded a save file with every souvenir - Turboo (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2013 (EDT)

does this link work? if it does, download it and import it as a gameshark snapshot - Turboo (talk) 17:55, 5 May 2013 (EDT)

http://www.gamefaqs.com/gba/922156-warioware-twisted/saves, download the first one - Turboo (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2013 (EDT)

i downloaded a .gsf soundtrack rip and converted the files (for the japanese versions/songs that were unedited in the localization), for the english/edited ones i recorded them through vba and trimmed them in audacity - Turboo (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2013 (EDT)

Re:Vandalism

Sorry about that. I was patrolling stuff via Special:Patrol; I had my mouse pointer on the "Endorse" button, though when I clicked, it somehow glitched down to the "Revert" button below.

PHOENIX (talk • edits) 21:26, 5 May 2013 (EDT)

You splash someone.

Why did you splash The Cutie Mark Crusaders?:

-- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 15:38, 7 May 2013 (EDT)

Because my assistant is The Zombie Bros. and that's that! -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 15:47, 7 May 2013 (EDT)

そうそう！今、あなたは私を理解することができますか？ -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 16:13, 7 May 2013 (EDT)

FRIENDS, TIME TURNER.

ABOVE!!! Da MegaDigga3!

Kitchen

Hi,

I removed the link from my user page. Actually I wanted to check if all the domes from SMG had an uppercase in their title, but now it's unnecessary if we're gonna rename all of them to [dome] (Super Mario Galaxy) instead of [dome (dome) or [dome] (Dome]. Thanks for warning me!
Banon (talk · edits) 11:42, 31 May 2013 (EDT)

Actually, I had two links to the page and I had only deleted one. I removed the last one, so it should be okay.
Banon (talk · edits) 11:56, 31 May 2013 (EDT)

re:Knockoffs

Naw, "controversies" (as in media outrage over content in Mario games or related products) and rip-offs are reasonably distinct subjects. Let's not content-creep that page. --Glowsquid (talk) 19:13, 4 June 2013 (EDT)

Just To Let You Know

Hi Time Turner! Sorry I left the Mini Mountaineer article a stub. I was going to start it before my dinner, and then I would edit it more after that. It usually takes me a day or two to complete a New Super Mario Bros. U challenge article. Please know that I do not rush to create an article, and that I do different parts at different times. Can the stub be removed? I expect to be completed with the article tomorrow. MarioKartManiac (talk) 19:15, 13 June 2013 (EDT)

I'll make sure I'll get it done. I've never gotten a stub on one of my articles before since I didn't start right before a meal, and my other articles aren't erased! After I'm done, can I remove the stub? MarioKartManiac (talk) 19:51, 13 June 2013 (EDT)

Oh really? Never knew about using colons! I've been here for only 3 months so far, so I've been catching on to those types of details. So when I'm done with the article, I can still take the stub off, right? Articles I know of like Time Attack Trial and Acorn Plains Speed Run are going to be around the same size of Mini Mountaineer, and those two don't have stubs. MarioKartManiac (talk) 20:01, 13 June 2013 (EDT)

I have just completed writing the objective for Mini Mountaineer. By the way, challenges in New Super Mario Bros. U are not as long as real levels, so articles about NSMBU challenges will be shorter. I will be adding a picture to complete the article today or tomorrow, and I will be complete. Thank you for the info on the colons. MarioKartManiac (talk) 20:18, 13 June 2013 (EDT)

I am complete with the article now. Can you please remove the stub? MarioKartManiac (talk) 11:55, 14 June 2013 (EDT)

I remember the stub saying "please don't remove until an acceptable amount of info has been added". I guess I could of, but I didn't know if I was allowed to. Thank you for some of the info you gave me! MarioKartManiac (talk) 15:31, 14 June 2013 (EDT)

WarioWare

I noticed that you had the template WarioWare Smooth Moves in your unfinished work page, and recently I had created Lifeline and Survival, and I'm not sure whether I'm coming into conflict with what you want to and whether it'd be okay to create the other multiplayer minigames and maybe the Staff Credits one. Yoshi876 (talk)

Re: Deleting Categories

I'm not that familiar with category policy, but I'd go with a TPP on the off-chance there are people who are opposed to the idea but haven't seen the page or voiced their opinions. As an aside, you might want to link to the category talk page next time (or just mention the category without linking to it), since when you linked to it as you did, you placed my talk page into the category. Mario4Ever (talk) 13:55, 5 August 2013 (EDT)

Sick Status Effect

My computer supports Macromedia Dreamweaver MX 2004, so it may support the 2004 flash player. If someone knows the version of it I will open it and upload the images. User:Whitey (talk / edits)

Question

Do you have a 3DS and New Leaf? I'm looking for New Leaf buddies.--UM3000

I have a question, can you help?

It's here: Talk:The_Year_of_Luigi_Sound_Selection Agentdave7 (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2013 (EDT)

• Thanks for responding to my question. I'll try uploading one right now, to see if it works. Agentdave7 (talk) 13:49, 29 September 2013 (EDT)

User:Yoshi876 said I should ask you. Thanks for the indent tip. Agentdave7 (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2013 (EDT)

Quotes

Standard is pretty much the only reason, really. I don't really even understand why it is myself; it's just standard.

-Toa 95 (talk)

Move

Sorry, but unless the redirect gets deleted, I can't move it back.

-Toa 95 (talk)

Patroller can block user, but they can't delete pages. -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 17:02, 9 February 2014 (EST)

I check the deletion log and there is no delete contribution from Toa 95. -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 17:05, 9 February 2014 (EST)

Hi Time Turner

I see that you had regenerated again. And here's living proof:

[1]

See? -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 09:21, 16 February 2014 (EST)

Present

To celebrate my anniversary, I'll give you a present.

The Present.
File:Starchildren2.PNG

Take great care of it. -- PanchamBro (talk • contributions) 20:07, 16 February 2014 (EST)

Hi

Hello. Do you want to be friends? -- Joeypmario 16:22, 19 February 2014 (EST)

Super Smash Bros. Brawl Unfeaturing

I've shortened the plot section in the Subspace Emissary section. It's still quite long, but it's very difficult condensing it even further without leaving out vital details. Still, I hope I've done enough to reduce the section since I did rewrote the entire dang thing from scratch. Although I did not fix the other problems yet, please consider what I've done for the Subspace Emissary plot section. Thanks! It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 23:17, 20 February 2014 (EST)

Actually, I've addressed every single issue you've had a problem with in the Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Here we go:

"Let me start off with the most evident thing: there is a rewrite template for the Subspace Emissary section. According to rule 5, this already means that it doesn't deserve to keep its FA status. To elaborate, the section describing the plot is absolutely filled with grammatical errors ("which they proceed to carrier off"), speculative text ("whose intent is to kill Lucas"), and especially fanciful writing ("Lucas soon gets his foot snagged on an unearthed root"). None of these are acceptable in a wiki article."

I rewrote the entire thing, from scratch, probably cutting the entire plot section in half or even more than that. I've gotten rid of unnecessary details of each scene (e.g. "Mario picks his nose, twirls his mustache two and half times, and lolls out his tongue as he dies, lazy-eyed." to "Mario dies"). Yes, the writing was horrible. The section may be quite long, but it's extremely difficult to further heavily condense the thing without removing significant plot points (nearly every cutscene advances or describes the plot in some way, so the section is basically a sum up of each cutscene).

"Besides that, though, another aspect that I'm not particularly fond of is the article's abuse of subsections. For example, the Rules section, which carries fourteen subsections. Most of them are relatively basic in the first place, with some only having a single sentence. That section can certainly be organized in a better fashion (do we even need that much info on rules?). Small subsections crop up around the entire article, though, and I really think that it would benefit from a clean scrubbing of sections."

The amount of unnecessary detail into each subsection (particularly, the rules section) is horrendous, so I removed the subsections and removed the descriptions of some rulesets (do we need really every single description on "loser pick", setting stock intervals, setting time intervals, having a subsection on damage ratio? No! So, I either deleted the details or merged the subsections into one bigger section.

"Also, this article does not describe at all what the gameplay is like. The Gameplay section covers what's new about this game in regards to its predecessors, but it does not state at all how the game actually plays, which I think is just a silly thing to gloss over."

This is the first one I dealt with. Good thing you acknowledge this being improved until it's not a problem anymore.

"The descriptions for the stages are also not very descriptive. Some of them say things like "it is filled with many gimmicks that can either assist or hinder the player", "this stage encorporates elements of various Fire Emblem games" (oh hey, a typo), and "Very similar to Corneria and Venom", which tells me nothing. I know that we have the actual articles of those stages to fully describe them, but if the description leaves me with more questions than answers, it's not a good description. There may be other things that I haven't mentioned, but what I have here is a laundry list of problems with this article."

Done. Yes, the descriptions are woefully vague and bare. Good thing I added the stage hazards and what actually happens in those stages. So, we have a more fleshed out description for each stage, ensuring that those that want a general idea don't need to click on the links. There.

I dedicated hours to satisfying your complaints so please, if there is anything else that needs a thorough cleanup, please, please, please let me know. If not, I think this article can stay featured. :) It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 01:08, 21 February 2014 (EST)

I don't really expect people to help me, though, and I don't know who will. Lord Grammaticus said that he would do some of the work, but I don't know when, and I want to do it before the article gets unfeatured. I have a very bad tendency to lack initiative, and once I get started, I dedicate my efforts to have it completed as soon as I can, or else I'll simply forget about it.

Anyway, I'll be working on character descriptions shortly. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:30, 21 February 2014 (EST) _{Me and Mario7 are two different people.}

Nah, this is probably one of the few times I'd like to engage in a one-plumber effort. I've done it before. I'll do it again. Also, I'm not rushing either. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:44, 21 February 2014 (EST)

Expanded on the character sections, partly. I'd like to see if this is what you're thinking about, and I will expand on additional characters shortly, if you approve. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:05, 21 February 2014 (EST)

Well, writing goes through proofreading all the time. And it's not like it's horrific. I guess my writing isn't top notch, but I was trying to write varied sentence structures. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:26, 21 February 2014 (EST)

That was oversight and a typo on my part, heh. Don't know how I eff up with Link's section like that, but my writing should be good otherwise. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:51, 21 February 2014 (EST)

Your gifts

User:TrickyMario7654

Appel

Template:AppealNotice User:TrickyMario7654

shadow queen FA

There are more issues?? Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

So?? Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

Awful!!Ok, what do you suggest to I expand the article?? Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

OK,i trimmed the background part a bit.... what does it looks?? Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

This means that I should replace the stuff by "better" stuff?? Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

Ah, now I understood. But... I don't know how to "expand" it...My english sucks...And I never played PMTTYD

MDP

Okay, I'll try hard not to talk about him in the future, but you've gotta admit, he sure is one persistent vandal. Epic Rosalina 18:55, 4 March 2014 (EST)

Still Hanging off a D

I got the picture! Talk:Fourth wall Triple K, Skye 20:31, 8 March 2014 (EST)

How

How was the way it was before better? It took out sections for no apparent reason, took out information for no apparent reason, used a quote that wasn't as defining for her character, and the worst part was, had a completely horribly written description for her appearance. Her hair isn't brown, her eyes aren't sky-blue, her hair isn't short. Please tell me how it's better, and please actually work on this article if you have all those problems with it. You have done so little to improve this despite heading the unfeature status. UhHuhAlrightDaisy (talk) 22:40, 9 March 2014 (EDT)

This is literally what you just reverted it back to saying: " She has an short light brown hair (longer and orange in the past, but in the Nintendo 64 games, it was dark brown). The Mario Party 6 official site refers her hair as orange." Just read that. Aside from being wrong, look at how horrible this grammer is. It's literally STUPID. You reverted it just because you think her page needs to be smaller, but you don't even actually care about the quality of the page. UhHuhAlrightDaisy (talk) 22:43, 9 March 2014 (EDT)

And these are the other things you want to remove:

• "Years after her initial appearance, Daisy started appearing in more and more Mario games because of a lack of human characters in the series.[2] She now appears in the majority of Mario spin-off games, often a playable character. Daisy is good friends with Princess Peach, and she interacts positively with many other characters. Daisy has appeared in more than forty Mario series games to date, and continues to regularly."

This states why she started appearing as a playable character. It gives an actual reason for it, backed up by official statement. It also addressees her status in the games, and her recognizable number of appearances.

• "Daisy is a tomboy, something made clear in her debut appearance.[3] Daisy is represented by the colors yellow, orange, and green. She has an affinity for flowers; her attire, special abilities, personal emblems and general representations are often flowers."

Again, this is something detailing who she is, and what she's about, and again, the first statement is referenced with an official statement.

• "She has repeatedly used one-liners like, "yeah-hoo," said in dixie accent, and even, "yo," in an urban accent."

This is following the statement of her contemporary-vernacular. It explains what this slang she uses is, with actual quotes for example. And finally, there is seemingly nothing wrong with her descriptions for her appearance and clothing being detailed like a novel. Rosalina and Peach's pages are this detailed, and Rosalina's is still featured and always has been. Please do not pick on the character. UhHuhAlrightDaisy (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2014 (EDT)

You understand that "other articles have this problem, so this article should have it as well" is NEVER a valid argument? Why do we need paragraphs of crap describing her attire? It's much better to provide a much clear and simple description rather than dwelve into paragraphs and PARAGRAPHS of description, ESPECIALLY when an image of Daisy will do. Standards change over time, and I think Rosalina's article should be cleaned up if that's the case because we honestly don't need every single nitty gritty detail about their clothes. Less is more when it comes to information, and we prefer concise clear information rather than so much fan freaking worship-like descriptions of what they look like. And you don't blame Time Turner for rewriting her description: I did that. Ray Trace^(T|C) 23:52, 9 March 2014 (EDT)

daisy

what is the ramainig problems??i wanna fix, if i can Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

I can also help, and I wasn't meaning to talk with an "attitude" but I am happy that the nomination is not passing anymore. Epic Rosalina 18:46, 10 March 2014 (EDT)

Also, Rosa, can you undo my edits in the Smahs Bros, mario kart and mario golf sections??? Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

Talking about images, TT, how does the articles look?? Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

What is wrong,exactly, about the abilities section??

P.S The section doesn't need to be like the MP section. (Because I did it and I only liked it in the MT section) Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

FA's

Soes Super Princess Peach looks good for be an FA?? (I know that I can't feature another article right now) Ashley(and Red) File:Ashley WarioWare Touched.png

The appeal has been denied just like Peach's Objection in Sunshine

My appeal for the warning ended up being overruled just like Peach's Objection in Sunshine to the attourney. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2jYAis-Aq4 -Pwwnd123

Anyways

I do go to the chatroom and I talk about things in general just because I am bored and I have nothing to do at all and I am reaally extremely sorry for my embarassing behavior and I promise I won't be mean and won't be so naughty anyways. -Pwwnd123

Pizza

I assume you want to delete all the links to the article seeing as your TPP passed. Yoshi876 (talk)

Oh well, as long as it's done. Nice to see you're a fan of Doctor Who as well. Yoshi876 (talk)

Yeah, I can do it. Yoshi876 (talk)

That's them done, only three remaining links are comments on the Poop talkpage, the proposals page, and The 'Shroom page. Proposals will go soon, but if you feel The 'Shroom one can go feel free to remove it. Yoshi876 (talk)

About the Hotel Mario page

Technically it was right to call Princess Toadstool Princess Peach because considering Yoshi's Safari came out for the SNES came out in 1993 which was a year before Hotel Mario came out and Peach's name wasn't reverted back to Toadstool until Super Mario RPG Legend of the Seven Stars. Here is proof of it and so yeah I was right. - Pwwnd123 (talk)

Proofs:<youtube>kCxDNKm11PU</youtube>} <youtube>V_0obHn1nRI</youtube>} -Pwwnd123 (talk)

Signature

I'm not going to give you a {{sigfix}}, but I believe your signature violates the signature policy, specifically rule number one, which is that "your signature must include your username, or a shortened or altered version of it, or a nickname, as long as it is still instantly recognizable as pertaining to you". "Allons-y" and a picture of a horse may not cut it. PikaSamus (talk) 21:43, 18 June 2014 (EDT)

Friends/getting to know you.

Will you be my friend? If you say yes' I wanna get to know you. If no' then oh we'll. Joseph (talk) (contribs)

Read my user page. And tell me if that's not enough. Joseph (talk) (contribs)

re:this

The "theories, hoaxes" part wasn't in my initial writeup and I have no bloody idea who added it Having the page as a place to dump fan theories is precisely what I said the page *shouldn't* degenerate into when I presented the idea to the other staff members. --Glowsquid (talk) 16:47, 6 September 2014 (EDT)

Thor1818

You recently gav a Warning to Thor1818, right? I would have issued a Last Warning, because it has both fan-made sentences and he also capitalized all words in Sonic edit, which is minor vandalism which deserves a Lastwarn. TSUNAMI

RE:Nes Remix

Well, the series has now got famous. Fanon is striving for SNES Remix, and maybe GB Remix and on. I'm not saying that it is a shame that we haven't but, but since the series has its charm and some like Mario Strikers, which have just 2 and so not much famous, I was amazed none thinkd about creating it. At least, I did so, so now that we have it, it's a good thing, right? I just got bold. TSUNAMI

And I know. But since it is a series that is well famous, I suggest to make the series page as soon as possible. Since none makes it, I just created it. And I have the feel that the series will be long-lasting. TSUNAMI

BJAODN

Sorry, I don't want to analyze a "joke", but how doesn't it add to the humor? I initially didn't understand why the image is there other than the stupid watermark. I think there needs to be some clarification there. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:38, 7 September 2014 (EDT)

Glitches thing

Glitchs that are obtained by cheating are allowed? E.G. in Super Mario RPG you get strange symobls when HP gots to 1000. Or similar things should go somewhere else? TSUNAMI

Re: Soundtrack

i think i downloaded the minigsfs and used foobar2000 and this plugin to convert them to ogg. the filenames are all pretty descriptive, so it shouldn't be hard to find anything - Turboo (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2014 (EDT)

no problem, let me know if you need any extra help - Turboo (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2014 (EDT)

Sources

Time Turner I would like to clear out a misunderstanding here. You reverted my edited on Grandma Toadstool. You also said to give a source. There was a source in the article that said that Grandma Toadstool was the Mushroom King's mother and Princess Toadstool's grandmother. - 66.87.73.87 (User talk:66.87.73.87) 21:49, 10 September 2014 (EDT)

Proposal : Delete Category "Characters who break the Fourth Wall"

If many agrees to delete the category about "Characters who break the Fourth Wall", do you think this 'page' will be enough?

Mario Party Advance icons

Question: any reason you labeled the MPA icons as WarioWare Twisted images, or was it just a a mistake? --driftmaster130 (Talk • Edits) 17:49, 16 September 2014 (EDT)

RE: Personal Image Warning

You can just delete them. [[User:Trainiax|Mario Kart Master]] #MarioKartMaster #MK8 (talk) 19:26, 18 September 2014 (EDT)

Bowser.

Is bowser the only main villain to say Mario? Joseph (talk) (contribs)

Rewrite templates

Hey. When you place a rewrite template on an article you now need to add a reason, as well as the date you tagged it on due a new policy. Yoshi876 (talk)

The list of allies and stuff

Wow, I didn't realize my objection would lead you to be thinking harder than you expect. I guess that's a good thing. I think the lists aren't really that great. How often do people edit it? And just hover over some of the names: "Mario games wouldn't be much of a challenge without these fiends." Mildly amusing, but not that great of that "professional" and "serious" impression we're supposed to showcase. Oh, it always feel nice to argue with people that know how to argue. :)

Hm... I'm thinking too how the lists can be improved on, but the only thing I can come up is maybe removing "List of Enemies" and "List of Allies", and "List of Bosses" and buffing up the "character" and "species" superlists. What I mean by that, maybe we can add special marks to enemies, a different special mark to allies, and another special mark to bosses (so overlapping characters, maybe somebody like Koopa Kid get both marks). The problem, those marks can really clutter the page since most characters are either enemies or allies. And there are a few instances where there may be a question mark on who gets what. Take Koopa Troopas: you initially think of them as generic enemies, but Koopa Troopas are always friendly in the Mario Party games.

My own question leads me into yet another question: why aren't Koopa Troopas listed as allies in the "List of allies" page?_{but Shy Guys are...} Mind you, I'm referring to Koopas collectively; just because Koops is friendly doesn't mean Koopa Troopas should be considered allies. You know the general question behind this... right? What qualifies as an ally or an enemy?

Another thing bothering me about those lists are the debut medium appearances that follow shortly after the name. It gives a good general idea for what game they appear in, but for those with multiple appearances, like Mario or Bowser... seeing Donkey Kong listed after Mario's name just irks me for some reason. And... why does Shy Guy have Mario vs. Donkey Kong? And what about crossover characters like Kirby or Link? Kirby and Link obviously qualify for the List of allies since they are friendly characters in the comics. The lists are incomplete.

I'm spouting my thoughts here. It's a whole friggin' lot of questions, but don't be intimidated: feel free to comment if you like. Your thoughts would be appreciated, and I do enjoy these conversations... It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 23:11, 24 September 2014 (EDT)

Oh, good thing, I've made a post on the forum. Maybe my idea will get some ground. I hope there aren't any major flaws to it. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 23:58, 24 September 2014 (EDT)

Trophies

It should help, but obviously I only have so many trophies to get the actual meat for the sections (descriptions). I am trying to get all the trophies I can, though.

-Toa 95 (talk)

No subject

Oh, hey. I appreciate you cleaning those generic object pages. --Glowsquid (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2014 (EST)

hey, cool job on the LM beta page. --Glowsquid (talk) 13:40, 29 November 2014 (EST)

RE: Isaac Marshall

Donkey Kong Country Exposed L151

Wario's Woods bosses

I see you reverted the names of the Wario's Woods bosses back to their Japanese names. Was the instruction manual mentioned in the talk page a fake? Zakor1138 (talk) 16:58, 29 November 2014 (EST)

Hey, time turner

How do you mark an image as personal? I really need to know this Toadbrigade5 (talk) 20:40, 1 December 2014 (EST)

RE: Piano

2007 me was assuming too much, I can't find an official name for this fella, just many fan made ones. Paper Jorge (Talk·Contribs)

RE: Wario's Woods

The names are in the manual, which you can find here. You should've done your research before reverting my changes. ST Falcon (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2014 (EST)

List of Luigi's Mansion beta elements

Good question! However, I can answer somewhere around 99% of the beta elements for Luigi's Mansion. So to answer your question, the article states, "Concepts for Luigi's Mansion, such as character designs, were being planned during the Nintendo 64's lifetime. The game was originally planned to release for the Nintendo 64, while it was at the end of its lifespan, but was later moved to the GameCube due to hardware limitationsTemplate:Refneeded" and on this article, it states:

"Q: When did you start working on the characters?

Konno: Well, we had character designers working parallel to the team working on the map and industrial design. Some of these ideas were already on paper with thoughts of the Nintendo 64.

Q: Did the change from cartridge to optical media prove helpful?

Konno: I don't think it proved much difference with this project. We did all the cinematography using the real-time engine. Perhaps if we used more CG calibur sequences, it would have been more useful."

So if you think hard enough, the question asked to Konno of "Did the change from cartridge to optical media prove helpful?" hints it for a possibility that this Nintendo GameCube launch title was likely meant for the N64. Along with the fact that this image of Daisy from a Mario Tennis sprite for the Nintendo 64 was left behind and is still within the game's coding. So because of my two sources, I think that it could be plausible that Luigi's Mansion might've been a game meant to be released for the N64 or at the very least started development for it. Jjrapper100 (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2014 (EST)

LinkTheLefty

Sorry. He appeared to be making a major edit to the Wario's Castle page without approval. He also was making many consecutive edits on that same page, which is a Level One offense here on the Super Mario Wiki. I promptly issued him a reminder for this. McDonalds1 (talk) 18:14, 4 December 2014 (EST)

These offending "consecutive edits" seem to be mostly minor. Can you actually even "warn" someone over (properly marked) minor edits? LinkTheLefty (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2014 (EST)

And since when did "Major Edits" require approval? Never. Consecutive edits? Not an offense if they all are helpful. This is a (every cuss word that makes sense here, cuz I don't know how to swear) warning. This warning should be appealed instantly, this is not a question.