Talk:Pink Gold Peach: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
Ok. Thanks, I didn't know that. [[User:Marioguy|Marioguy]] ([[User talk:Marioguy|talk]]) 17:52, 18 November 2015 (EST)
Ok. Thanks, I didn't know that. [[User:Marioguy|Marioguy]] ([[User talk:Marioguy|talk]]) 17:52, 18 November 2015 (EST)


== What's the point of Pink Gold Peach's existence? ==
== Gold Peach ==


I know this is old, but with Mario Kart 8 Deluxe having been released over 7 months ago (and the original Mario Kart 8 over 3 years ago), I thought that this needed to be said. I mean, I'm perfectly fine with clones, babies, metals, etc., but Nintendo should seriously consider having a drop down menu system similar to that of the Smash Bros. series, since they shouldn't hog up the character roster. 
So, question, should we add ''[[Super Mario Party]]'' regarding appearances on here, or should we create make the Gold Peach redirect into an actual article for that purpose? [[User:Weedle McHairybug|Weedle McHairybug]] ([[User talk:Weedle McHairybug|talk]]) 08:52, 11 December 2018 (EST)
EDIT: Never mind, turns out that was just an effect from the Golden Drink. [[User:Weedle McHairybug|Weedle McHairybug]] ([[User talk:Weedle McHairybug|talk]]) 08:54, 11 December 2018 (EST)


Since Shy Guy and Yoshi have a drop down menu system for their color variations, so the same should apply for clones, babies, metals, etc., but not a lousy drop down menu system that Metal Mario and Gold Mario share, since they're not unique characters, just metal clones of Mario himself. 
== Protect page ==


History of clones, babies, metals, etc.:<br>
As crap as this character may be, I feel this page should be protected since it's clearly prone to vandalism (maybe because of how unpopular this character is) [[User:Mario Sakuraba|Mario Sakuraba]] ([[User talk:Mario Sakuraba|talk]]) 13:50, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
-Mario Kart: Double Dash!!: first Mario Kart that started this brand new completely out of no where characters (Toadette) and babies (Baby Mario and Baby Luigi).<br>
:The vandalism has been a returning vandal, but if it becomes a major issue, it will be protected. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 13:56, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
-Mario Kart Wii: the babies trend got a little out of hand again...<br>
:I highly doubt popularity or lack thereof even factors into a majority of the vandalism that occurs here anyway. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 15:43, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
-Mario Kart 7: we got Metal Mario.<br>
::Given they've only vandalized this and Baby Rosalina's pages (with both of them generally being regarded as the most blatant roster-filler ever) I'd say in this case it's likely. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 16:57, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
-Mario Kart 8: we got the entire Koopalings, more clones, metals, babies, etc., such as Pink Gold Peach. 
::I did say ''"majority"'' for a reason. Vandals with personal problems aren't unheard of. I just don't think that's as much the case as Sakuraba seems to think - character quality or popularity certainly doesn't factor into whether or not a page should be protected outside of high traffic, that's for sure. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 18:46, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
 
:::Just making sure. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:51, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
My best guess for her existence wasn't necessarily to give Metal Mario a girlfriend rather was just a quick and easy character to make, but that's just speculation. And considering the fact that there's a statue of Baby Pink Gold Peach in GCN Baby Park in Mario Kart 8, I wouldn't be surprised if Baby Pink Gold Peach (or perhaps even Green Bronze Luigi) makes it into Mario Kart 9's character roster.
 
But in all actuality, does anybody know why Pink Gold Peach exists? --[[User:Jjrapper100|Jjrapper100]] ([[User talk:Jjrapper100|talk]]) 22:30, 1 December 2017 (EST)

Latest revision as of 17:51, September 5, 2019

Pink Gold Peach[edit]

So, This will be Peach's Metal Mario...she's unlockable, right?

We don't know yet. BabyLuigiFire.pngRay Trace(T|C) 18:58, 30 April 2014 (EDT)
It must be, because if you see the first photo, Pink Gold Peach isn't there, then she is in the next photo.
A later version of the character select screen from Mario Kart 8
The full character selection screen in Mario Kart 8.
That's only because she wasn't announced when that picture was released. Same applies for Mii and Baby Rosalina.--

Poison Mushroom Orb in Puzzle & Dragons: Super Mario Bros. EditionDigibutterFrancis 04:36, 1 May 2014 (EDT)

Critical Reception[edit]

We all know that Pink Gold Peach is one of the most hated characters here, so do you think she deserves a section for reception? Marioguy (talk) 17:24, 18 November 2015 (EST)

No. We won't follow Wikipedia critical reception sections on fictional video game characters, as we think it's a bit on the, uh, ridiculous side. We allow reception sections only for video games only. BabyLuigiFire.pngRay Trace(T|C) 17:29, 18 November 2015 (EST)
What Baby Luigi said. Don't take "reception" sections on video game characters (or any character for that matter) from Wikipedia seriously because you can't really *rate* a character, compared to a game or a movie, much less one from a minimalist Mario series. You can note their legacy and their influence, but that's usually left to characters like Mario, Luigi, Peach, and Bowser anyway. All in all, it would be a bad idea to create a reception section for characters in general. Icon showing how many lives Mario has left. From Super Mario 64 DS. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 17:30, 18 November 2015 (EST)

Ok. Thanks, I didn't know that. Marioguy (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2015 (EST)

Gold Peach[edit]

So, question, should we add Super Mario Party regarding appearances on here, or should we create make the Gold Peach redirect into an actual article for that purpose? Weedle McHairybug (talk) 08:52, 11 December 2018 (EST) EDIT: Never mind, turns out that was just an effect from the Golden Drink. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 08:54, 11 December 2018 (EST)

Protect page[edit]

As crap as this character may be, I feel this page should be protected since it's clearly prone to vandalism (maybe because of how unpopular this character is) Mario Sakuraba (talk) 13:50, September 5, 2019 (EDT)

The vandalism has been a returning vandal, but if it becomes a major issue, it will be protected. Alex95sig1.pngAlex95sig2.png 13:56, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
I highly doubt popularity or lack thereof even factors into a majority of the vandalism that occurs here anyway. --ExdeathIcon.png Lord G. matters. ExdeathIcon.png 15:43, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
Given they've only vandalized this and Baby Rosalina's pages (with both of them generally being regarded as the most blatant roster-filler ever) I'd say in this case it's likely. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 16:57, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
I did say "majority" for a reason. Vandals with personal problems aren't unheard of. I just don't think that's as much the case as Sakuraba seems to think - character quality or popularity certainly doesn't factor into whether or not a page should be protected outside of high traffic, that's for sure. --ExdeathIcon.png Lord G. matters. ExdeathIcon.png 18:46, September 5, 2019 (EDT)
Just making sure. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:51, September 5, 2019 (EDT)