Category talk:Animate objects
Before I continue to start placing more of these categories on more page, anybody have any comments?Knife (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)
- Um.. rather stupid.
3D, yeh, like anyone listens to ME.. - Anybody at all?Knife (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2007 (EST)
Does anyone have a reason, does it warrant deletion?Knife (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2007 (EST)
Well, it seems somewhat useful for things like Trapdoors and Dumb Drum. -- Sir Grodus
Minis
Do Minis count as animate objects? Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
Delete this category
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Saturday, November 16, 2024, 23:43 GMT
The category's and the comments above make it clear that its premise is vague and confusing. Why is this category even a thing? You could argue that a lot of things are animate: Goombas, Koopa Troopas, Cheep Cheeps, and even Mario himself. All in all, this category is too vague to even exist, and should just be deleted.
Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: June 11, 2018, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
Oppose
Comments
Species and characters based on objects in the Mario universe. I mean, it makes sense to me. 
19:06, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
- But why doesn't Bob-omb and Bullet Bill appear in this category? They're "animate" objects to me.
(T|C) 19:10, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
- Those have their own categories, which could probably stand to be subcategories of this. Anyway, your argument doesn't hold up. The whole point of the category is that they're species based on normally inanimate objects. Goombas, Koopas, etc. are not objects.
19:15, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
- Those have their own categories, which could probably stand to be subcategories of this. Anyway, your argument doesn't hold up. The whole point of the category is that they're species based on normally inanimate objects. Goombas, Koopas, etc. are not objects.
