User talk:Walkazo/Archive 14

Archives

The first eleven months. The summer of '08. The winter of discontent. The spring of squelching superfluous spaces. The sporadic fall. The absentee school semester of 2009-2010 The age of the new computer The new computer's last springtime The hectic half of 2011 The first chunk of 2012 was even worse The summer of 2012 was average. The penultimate 2012-2013 school year. The nondescript age of whatever.

Status: Between volunteering, work, school and writing, I don't always have as much time to edit as I'd like, but I do what I can. And, if you have any questions or concerns or need help with something, fire away and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.

Please

stop your external links. It is a SMW page you were linking to, so why put an external link to an SMW page? The adress was http://www.mariowiki.com/, so dont do an external link next time. Use the wiki link for a wiki page. Unshy Guy (talk)

I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. - Walkazo 11:26, 21 November 2013 (EST)

He has a record of being pointless, just so you know. Me, GK Inc.!(talk! · edits!) The headers too!

Oh, I know. - Walkazo 21:18, 21 November 2013 (EST)

Changing username

So does that mean I can have one more change??

Crapfully yours, SuperFlameGuy (talk) (for now)

Yep, you're allowed two name changes per year. - Walkazo 22:14, 26 November 2013 (EST)

Re:Autopatrol

Curious, but what exactly went wrong with the process? Ray Trace^(T|C) 20:00, 11 December 2013 (EST)

Re: Autopatrolled Rank

Sure will try. Your response on Baby Luigi's talk page already answered any questions I had, and yeah it's definitely being put to better use. Funny how removing the rank created to make patrolling edits easier makes it much easier for the administrative team. :D GBAToad (talk) 08:05, 12 December 2013 (EST)

Re: Autopatrolled Rank

Very well, I understand. To be honest, I'm not that active on the wiki anymore anyway, so that one occasional autopatrolled edit doesn't really make a difference. Thanks for your trust! Lakituthequick 09:16, 12 December 2013 (EST)

Question

How do you know what the timestamp to put in for the new stub template is? Is it to do with what revision it is, or time of day? Yoshi876 (talk)

Just use {{SUBST:New stub}} and it automatically creates a timestamp giving the stub one week from that moment. As long as the template's placed on the stub the same day, that's all that needs to be done: the specific hour and minute don't matter. - Walkazo 20:37, 20 December 2013 (EST)

Proposal

I read your comments on my proposal, and I agree with you. I wasn't aware of the inconsistency and how the header text would look bare without such information on some articles. So I guess the best thing to do is to delete it. MegaKoopa (talk) 06:20, 26 December 2013 (EST)

Done. Also, just so you know, you need to set up the signature stuff so that the raw coding isn't pasted onto pages. Help:Signature explains how to do it. - Walkazo 19:48, 26 December 2013 (EST)

Hello

‎193.202.110.184 is vandalizing my talk. Please block them.

KP (talk · edits)

I already did - that's why I logged in in the first place =) - Walkazo 17:41, 27 December 2013 (EST)

Thank you. I can only get so many insults =)

KP (talk · edits)

Don't think of it that way: it's just another kind of spam. - Walkazo 17:49, 27 December 2013 (EST)

Oh, I know- I'm the owner of my own wiki where more than 20 spammers appear a day.

KP (talk · edits)

Zakipaul

Hello again, Walkazo. The user Zakipaul keeps creating the same fanmade pages over and over again, even after receiving a warning and a last warning. Please keep an eye on him. Thank you.

KP (talk · edits)

I already blocked him. - Walkazo 19:22, 28 December 2013 (EST)

OK then, sorry for being too late.

KP (talk · edits)

TPP

Is it possible to move it? ~~ Boo4761

Yeah, go ahead. It's early enough that you can still do it yourself. Don't bother archiving it on the proposal page or anything. - Walkazo 14:58, 2 January 2014 (EST)

chantalolive

that account was created a minute ago and the person created there talkpage advertising something indicating that they are a spammer

sorry my english no good but I dont want to create one account I just read the pages here

The preceding unsigned comment was added by ‎198.27.65.37 (talk).

Whilst I'm not sure it's spam, it could just be a link to their personal website, as seen by the web blog. Though it is very odd that a lot of accounts are being created with names that could be actual names and so there may be a connection. Yoshi876 (talk)

@anon: Thanks for the heads-up. It was their own talk page that they created so they indeed haven't broken any rules, but we'll keep an eye on the account to make sure it doesn't start spamming. - Walkazo 18:36, 2 January 2014 (EST)

i speak french the website is in french and it is advertizing e cigarets which are just as bad for your helth as real cigarets they are trying to advertize a product that is bad for you