User talk:Ghostkaiba297
Super Yoshi's welcome
Hiya, Ghostkaiba297! Hello! I'm Super-Yoshi, one of the many Sysops of the Mariowiki. You can see an image of me on the right side of the page. So, with that said, Welcome to the Super Mario Wiki!, which is a growing community and knowledge-base of the Marioverse. We're glad to have you as a member. If you have any questions, just post it on the FAQ talk page or ask me. The following articles contain guidance and information about reading, authoring, and participating in the Super Mario Wiki community. If this is your first time visiting, please read our Introduction. How do I do that? Specific Help
Categories You are welcome to browse through the following categories: External Resources Things you can do If you want, you can delete this message anytime you want. We hope that you can share your knowledge of the Marioverse as widely as possible. And, if you need any help, simply go to my talk and post a message, or ask a Sysop, as listed above. I wish you all the best! Sincerely, |
Hey, good job on adding references and stuff. If your linking to Wikipedia, then use this: [[wikipedia:InsertRandomTextHere]]. I hope you keep up the good editing. uper-Yoshi
Re: Kamek's discussion
I beat these two bosses again. Petey Piranha disappears in a white "explosion." Kamek doesn't even "explode", he just becomes transparent and disappears. --Grandy02 05:12, 3 May 2009 (EDT)
Re:Smithy
I stand by my decision. First of all, the fact that there is another boss that was un-possessed makes the trivia near-useless; since he's not the only one, he's not that unusual. Also, the wording in the trivia entry is questionable. We try to avoid language that clumps together games that are only related in their genre. And, besides, we try to add facts that we would be unable to fit in the rest of the article but are interesting or quirky. This one could fit nowhere in article, but is not unique, since Bowser, too, was fought without being possessed.
We've been trying to cut down the trivia here, so one that was questionably useful was cut from the article. I have nothing against you, promise! :P . 19:22, 26 April 2010 (EDT)