Mega Board Mayhem

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Revision as of 19:13, June 25, 2018 by 58.10.64.229 (talk)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Template:Board-infobox

File:Backroomball.jpg
The beginning of Mega Board Mayhem.

Mega Board Mayhem is a board from the extra room hosted by Thwomp in Mario Party 4. Thwomp gives no reason he built it, except that it took him six months to make it, and that he is proud of the results. Here, Thwomps are in charge of the shops and many Thwomps, Whomps, and a Ztar hop and dance around below the board.

Unlike normal boards on Party Mode, there are no Stars and Star Spaces found on the board, no special events, and no minigames each round. The goal is simply to get as many coins as possible and everyone starts with 100. To do that, there are many item spaces and Item Shops around, where the players can get Mega Mushrooms, Super Mega Mushrooms, or other items to steal coins from other players.

I have strong reason to believe that this suite of articles was written by a well meaning individual. Note that by disclosing the articles he was paid to create, he is following our terms of service More than one article up for deletion is legitimately notable. If it's excessively promotional, take the promotional fluff out. Basically, none of this stuff would be up for deletion if he hadn't FOLLOWED our terms of services and declared the two articles he was paid to create. When I have more time I will be back with further comments, but I hope you all realize that if you AFD articles on notable subjects by someone who created two disclosed paid articles, all you're going to do is ensure that no paid editor discloses, and that's actually doing more active harm to Wikipedia than before we got the damn TOS amendment on paid editing in place in the first place? Template:Ping - please take a look at these if you have a chance and happen to have more time than I, because I'm in crunch time, but it's a horrible idea to AFD notable subjects written by someone who followed our terms of service by disclosing the two articles he was paid to write. What do you all posting here view as a better situation: people spending hundreds of hours tracking anonymous paid editing groups that take actions to avoid our detection, or someone who has written about legitimately notable subjects without payment following our TOS and disclosing what he was paid to do so they could receive extra scrutiny? This chain of actions is the best way possible to drive good actors off and increase the market for the six Wiki-PR or bigger groups I'm currently aware of. User:Kevin Gorman | talk page

Template:Mario Party Board List