MarioWiki talk:Coverage: Difference between revisions
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(FA) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:Those would be legitimate articles. But remember SSB is of secondary importance, so please try to focus on Mario games more than these articles. Also remember to add only SSB categories. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | :Those would be legitimate articles. But remember SSB is of secondary importance, so please try to focus on Mario games more than these articles. Also remember to add only SSB categories. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | ||
== FA == | |||
Sorry if I overlooked this, but is it possible for a secondary or tertiary article to reach FA? --[[User:Yoshi626|'''<span style="color:green">Y</span>''']][[User talk:Yoshi626|'''<span style="color:black">o</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Yoshi626|'''<span style="color:green">s</span>''']][[Special:recentchanges|'''<span style="color:black">h</span>''']][[Special:random|'''<span style="color:green">i</span>''']][[User:Yoshi626|'''<span style="color:black">6</span>''']][[User talk:Yoshi626|'''<span style="color:green">2</span>''']][[Special:Contributions/Yoshi626|'''<span style="color:black">6</span>''']][[Image:Egg.PNG|20px]] 20:59, 31 January 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:59, January 31, 2007
Limiting article creations
I don't like that. While we should have main focuses and sub-focuses, the articles that we want created will eventually be created no matter what. Limiting the number of articles one can create in a week just slows down the wiki. --Steve (talk) 
21:42, 31 October 2006 (EST)
- However, # of new pages is also the easiest to keep track of at Special:Newpages. Do you suggest a higher general limit instead? Wa
TC@Y 22:45, 31 October 2006 (EST)
Honestly, wouldn't this just slow us down! Plus, it would be kinda irratating to keep checking the amount of pages and make sure the limit hasn't been violated... 3dejong
The problem is this is the Super Mario Wiki, not the Banjo-Kazooie wiki. Limits are meant to ensure that secondary and tertiary articles don't dominate this wiki at the expense of Mario. If it is the consensus of the wiki not to keep limits, that's fine by me. However, we should still keep this page to inform people of the focus of this wiki. -- Son of Suns
Shouldn't this be updated now.Knife (talk)
- I'll revise it tomorrow or Monday – maybe move it to a page about what topic goes to what wiki. Wa TC@Y 11:35, 30 December 2006 (EST)
spin-offs
Are there any Banjo, Conker, or any other Donkey Kong series spin-offs where a new character stars in his/her own game?--
Aipom 
--
Well... I think Timber might have had his own game planned, but it was cancelled, aside from that, no. There are rumors of a Squirrel High Command and Tediz game, both of those are from Conker's Bad Fur Day/Conker: Live & Reloaded, but, those are just rumors. -- Sir Grodus
What's Tediz?-- Aipom --
- Robo killer teddy bears. Blah. Anyway, this sounds OK. Just the main stuff.. cool.
3D, who's BAAACK! FINALLY!
Media
Should stuff be mentioned about the tv series, the real life people, etc.?Knife (talk)
- A new policy is in the works. It will cover what you have mentioned. -- Son of Suns
Items and Arenas
Sorry if this has been asked before but... should we make articles for the items and arena's that appear in the SSB series? - User: Ultimatetoad
- Those would be legitimate articles. But remember SSB is of secondary importance, so please try to focus on Mario games more than these articles. Also remember to add only SSB categories. -- Son of Suns
FA
Sorry if I overlooked this, but is it possible for a secondary or tertiary article to reach FA? --Yoshi626File:Egg.PNG 20:59, 31 January 2007 (EST)
