Talk:Giant Bowser: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:05, August 20, 2007

Is this article's title conjectural? I know the SSBM deal makes it at least part conjecture... YELLOW YOSHI 398

Did you say "Part Conjecture"?
I am Confused 22:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

You know, half conjecture; half not. There's a whole template for that. YELLOW YOSHI 398

Um... Merge with Bowser??? Max2 (talk)

I definitly say merge...... - Ultimatetoad

Yeah, merging it with Bowser would make a lot of sense. Keep the screenshot though :P - My Bloody Valentine

If it's a conjectural form, then it should be merged. ^Plumber 15:16, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

I'd have to disagee with the merge. Hope I'm not becoming A Link to the Past.

Paper Jorge! I give paper cuts so stand back!

Revision as of 14:16, July 26, 2007 (edit) Plumber (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:05, August 20, 2007 (edit) (undo) Paper Jorge (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	If it's a conjectural form, then it should be merged. {{User:Plumber/Pignature}} 15:16, 26 July 2007 (EDT)		If it's a conjectural form, then it should be merged. {{User:Plumber/Pignature}} 15:16, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

			:I'd have to disagee with the merge. Hope I'm not becoming A Link to the Past. http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/9276/papertoycf7.gif '''[[User:Paper Jorge\|Paper Jorge! I give paper cuts so stand back!]]''' http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/9276/papertoycf7.gif