MarioWiki:BJAODN/Proposals

This is the subpage containing all the dumb proposals made. (Well, not all, just funny ones)

BJAODN

BJAODN

Well, I was looking at the BJAODN page and I got to thinking, what if we included the BJAODN page in the BJAODN page (with all of the content put on)? All of the content on the page is nonsense, anyway, and would qualify to be on the BJAODN page.

Proposer: Super Mario Bros. (talk)
Deadline: 20:00, 2 May 2009

Include BJAODN Page in the BJAODN Page

1. Super Mario Bros. (talk) Per my wonderful ideas above.

Don't Include BJAODN Page in the BJAODN Page

1. Stooben Rooben (talk) - What? No offense, but this seems pretty pointless. I don't get how putting the page in itself is going to improve it.

Comments

I think the "Pie For Everyone" proposal would have been a great idea, too... Super Mario Bros. (talk)

(So we're going to duplicate the page on the page... Great idea.)

(I only made this proposal as a joke, with a reference to the "Pie For Everyone" proposal)

(Recursion is always funny. :P) Phoenix Rider (talk)

Move the page "Moogle" to "Moofle"

Just come on guys. For far too long this grave inaccuracy has been pressed upon us. If I may gain the support of this community, I propose we move the page "Moogle" to the more accurate "Template:Fakelink". This will clearly not just be a boost to our website's accuracy and traffic ratings, with this measure in place we stand to have a whopping 25% increase in revenue and and the decreased overhead and operating costs will likely be so good as to increase our profit margin as much as 40%! It seems unbelievable but it is true. We could make thousands more than we currently do, and all for such a simple page. MarioWiki, I implore you. Save our Moofle! Save our money!

Proposer: Snack 19:17, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

Deadline: November 4th, 17:00

Support (By doing so you will uphold profit, humor, community values, and pie.)

1. Snack 19:17, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
2. TCY 19:23, 27 October 2008 (EDT)
3. Uniju :D (talk) Per Snack. This will be a great advancement.
4. Super-Yoshi (talk) Wtf I founded Moofle, I deserve credit :(
5. Princess Grapes Butterfly (talk) Um per all?
6. Stooben Rooben (talk) - It's about time we start thinking about how to make this site more financially profitable.

Oppose (By doing this you are a commanist fool. And a Moofle hater.)

1. 1337Yoshi (talk) Aren't joke proposals OUTLAWED?
2. King Mario (talk) 1337: Well if they are not then they HAVE to be.
3. Luigi001 (talk) Just send it to the BJAODN.

Comments

AWESOME IDEA.

btw let's change this to the GI JOE EXTREME wiki. and make Pirate Goomba a fa. --Blitzwing 19:36, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

Might I suggest moving Snack to Template:Fakelink, Luigi to Template:Fakelink, and Mario to Template:Fakelink? Stooben Rooben (talk)

hey everyone lets move User:Moogle and User:WikiGuest both to Moofle because I feel like it. Super-Yoshi (talk)

No u. Stooben Rooben (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2008 (EDT)

((Oh, sure, that's great. Snack makes a joke proposal and everyone plays along. I make a joke proposal and an argument breaks out with two users leaving the site. -- Ghost Jam))

Pie for Everyone

By request of the creator, the infamous proposal is linked to rather than archived.

It should be noted that a "Pie Button" did manage to exist, although only very briefly.

Remove Circuit City ads

I propose that we remove the Circuit City ads and replace them with Best Buy ads, because my uncle is the manager of a Best Buy location, and it kind of offends me that there are Curcuit City ads (this ISthe nephew of a Best Buy manager you're talking to).-KP Shadow

(This proposal was later removed by Paper Jorge (talk) with the following statement: "Proposals like that are a NO. Talk to Porplemontage about them.")

Snufit Ball

A few times ago, some user created an article about the Snufit Ball, a projectile thrown by the Snufit enemy in Super Mario 64, it was deleted on the ground that it was "too minor", however I think it should be recreated.

If we have an article on Cheese, we must also allow an article on Snufit Ball. Cheese affect gameplay by boosting the chances of seeing a rare enemy in Luigi's Mansion, Snufit Ball hurt Mario. They both affect Gameplay, they both exist in the Marioverse, they both must have an article.

Proposer:Blitzwing
Deadline: January 24nd 17:00(EDT)

LET'S RECREATE SNUFIT BALL AGRESIVELLY

1. --Blitzwing 17:58, 17 January 2008 (EST) Me is proposer, me gave reasons.
2. Glitchman (talk · contribs) True, this is a very minor proposal and is a minor projectile, Blitzwing does have a point.
3. Stumpers! lolz. evan teh chezorz iz mur signifcant den dis, lulz. Blitzwing: you have good integrity. :)

Comments

Can we somehow get that Snifit Ball in the same article? Stumpers! 00:42, 18 January 2008 (EST)

Actuaally, the Snifit Ball came before the Snufit Ball, so it would make sense to have Snufit Ball in the Snifit Ball article, but whatever. ALL HAIL SNUFIT BALL ALL HAIL SNUFIT BALL. --Blitzwing 06:50, 18 January 2008 (EST)

Now wait. Projecticles are still different from objects that can be activated, so the comparison with the Cheese article is quite unfitting. I vote for "Only when it gets over two lines of text". - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:36, 18 January 2008 (EST)

Do Snifit Balls even have official names?Knife (talk) 16:08, 18 January 2008 (EST)

No, but then again, Cheese wasn't named in it's Luigi Mansion appearance except in those unofficial player guide with dubious info. --Blitzwing 16:39, 18 January 2008 (EST)

Is this a serious proposal or a jab at the people who opposed deleting Cheese? >_> NMRodo

Both. --Blitzwing 17:07, 18 January 2008 (EST)

The cheese article has a good length. Something that only consists of:

A Snufit Ball is a small black orb that Snufits spit out of their tubular mouths at Mario in Super Mario 64 and Super Mario 64 DS. They can easily be avoided, but will hurt Mario by one damage point if he touches them.

does not qualify for an article. Not "affecting gameplay" is the ticket to an article, but rather whether the article can actually provide content. And as of now, you don't seem to get past the above version of it. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 17:11, 18 January 2008 (EST)

(Blitzwing later withdrawn the proposal when Cobold modificated "the awesome vote headers".)

(Also note that after this proposal was archived here, someone voted for it again. "Oh no" indeed)

Someone help!

I need help with my comic project: comics N Gang and Club Nintendo.

(This was on the proposals page.)

Unboringfy MarioWiki:Userboxes

I am appalled at the destruction of creativity there. Appalled.

Proposer: Plumber (talk)
Deadline: 18 May 2011

Support

1. Plumber (talk) D:
2. Beanbean (talk) D:
3. Super-Yoshi (talk) D:
4. Master Crash (talk) D: Makes me wanna make.
5. Xzelion (talk) D:

Comments

D: Beanbean (talk) 03:48, 11 May 2011 (EDT)

D: Xzelion (talk)

D: Super-Yoshi (talk)

D: Master Crash (talk)

Split the level articles from the world articles and delete the world articles

I think it is a good idea to make articles for levels for example an article named World 1-1. Proposer: Superfiremario (talk)
Voting Start: April 16, 2011, 20:40 GMT
Deadline: April 23, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Superfiremario (talk) Duh, it's my proposal!

Oppose

1. Reddragon19k (talk) - Per myself! Bowser's Castle is in World 8 in the Super Mario Bros. series, and the Grandmaster Galaxy is in World S in Super Mario Galaxy 2. Keep it!
2. Nicke8 (talk) That'd make a lot of disambugation pages, like for 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, and 1-4.
3. Mario4Ever (talk) Per my comments. If people want information on levels from a specific world in a specific game, they can get all they need from the games' articles. There is no need to make articles on individual levels.
4. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) Per Nicke8
5. SWFlash (talk) Per Hooktail (aka red dragon).
6. Zero777 (talk) Leave it as is, and I don't think anybody will dedicate that much time.
7. Bowser's luma (talk) Per all.
8. DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr. (talk) Per all.
9. Walkazo (talk) - Per all. If we were going to change anything, I'd actually rather go the other way and merge level articles into the worlds, like how the 3D games are done, since that makes navigation way faster and saves on space. In most cases, the levels can be summarized fairly succinctly anyway (remember, we're not a walkthrough, so big detailed descriptions often aren't necessary).
10. DKPetey99 (talk) Like what you said here, this is useless! :(
11. Phoenix (talk) - Per all.
12. Luigi is OSAM (talk) Per Nicke8
13. Mariomario64 (talk) Per all.
14. Kaptain K. Rool (talk) - What? Delete the world articles? Are you serious? World articles count and how are we supposed to know which levels belong in which world. Besides, if we delete the world articles, it will take up a lot of red links on the wanted pages. I 100% oppose this and I don't want articles such as Kongo Jungle deleted.

Comments

The dates were all done wrong: this was proposed on the 15th (at 20:43 GMT), so voting starts on the 16th, and ends at 23:59 GMT on the 23rd. I had to remove the opposing votes because voting hasn't actually started yet. Please read the rules before making proposals: Rule 2 explains exactly how to do the dates. - Walkazo (talk)

What are you trying to say? This proposal is WAY TOO VAGUE. Zero777 (talk)

Vague? The thing's not even coherent. I assume we're supposed to make an article titled World 1-1 and mention every game that has one. I can't see why that would be useful. Mario4Ever (talk)

Let me rephrase it the way I see it. "Currently all articles on levels are included in a general world; for example, all levels from World 1 are in the same article. I propose that these articles be split off to instead create "World 1-1 (Super Mario Bros.)", "World 2-1 (Super Mario Bros.)", etc." Marioguy1 (talk)

When put that way, the phrasing makes more sense, though the action proposed isn't any more useful. Mario4Ever (talk)I think it is a good idea to make articles for levels for example an article named World 1-1.