Template talk:SMB: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{talk}} | {{talk}} | ||
Can ''[[Super Mario Bros. 35]]'' have it's own row on this template? I just random paged onto [[Enemy clone]] and the sight of a page with no navboxes hurts my soul. I kid, I kid, but it feels really strange to have that any article just float around without a navbox. While mixing it is a bad idea for similar reasons to [[Template:DK]] discussed [[Template talk:DK#Split between classic and Game Boy versions|here]], surely a entirely separate row isn't so bad? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 18:40, November 2, 2024 (EDT) | Can ''[[Super Mario Bros. 35]]'' have it's own row on this template? I just random paged onto [[Enemy clone]] and the sight of a page with no navboxes hurts my soul. I kid, I kid, but it feels really strange to have that any article just float around without a navbox. While mixing it is a bad idea for similar reasons to [[Template:DK]] discussed [[Template talk:DK#Split between classic and Game Boy versions|here]], surely a entirely separate row isn't so bad? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 18:40, November 2, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:Not at all, I approve the adding of those two elements (being the [[Enemy clone]] and the [[POW Block]]), with his own "asterisk". --{{User:Mariuigi_Khed/sig}} 11:37, November 3, 2024 (EST) | :Not at all, I approve the adding of those two elements (being the [[Enemy clone]] and the [[POW Block]]), with his own "asterisk". Let's try [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Template%3ASMB&type=revision&diff=4420710&oldid=4418972 this] --{{User:Mariuigi_Khed/sig}} 11:37, November 3, 2024 (EST) |
Revision as of 11:42, November 3, 2024
Enemy Clones and other objects
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Can Super Mario Bros. 35 have it's own row on this template? I just random paged onto Enemy clone and the sight of a page with no navboxes hurts my soul. I kid, I kid, but it feels really strange to have that any article just float around without a navbox. While mixing it is a bad idea for similar reasons to Template:DK discussed here, surely a entirely separate row isn't so bad? Salmancer (talk) 18:40, November 2, 2024 (EDT)
- Not at all, I approve the adding of those two elements (being the Enemy clone and the POW Block), with his own "asterisk". Let's try this -- Mariuigi Khed 11:37, November 3, 2024 (EST)