MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Wii: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=23:40, 1 May 2010 (GMT)
|lastedit=14:52, 11 July 2010
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|nominated=23:40, May 1 2010
}}
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Reversinator}} First off, I have to say it's acutally a good article. But it lacks one major thing: it lacks a description of its games. That'd be like just listing enemies for a game and not explaining anything about them. Speaking of expansion, where did the description for the Virtual Console go?


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
Line 13: Line 12:
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} Per the guys above me.
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} Per the guys above me.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Uh, the description for the Virtual Console is [[Wii#Virtual Console Channels|here]]. And for the rest of your complaints, the guys above me nailed it.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Uh, the description for the Virtual Console is [[Wii#Virtual Console Channels|here]]. And for the rest of your complaints, the guys above me nailed it.
#{{User|KS3}} Per all.
#{{User|Byllant}} - I see no problem with this article, keep FA stats.
#{{User|Larryman}} - I do not see a problem with the article
#{{User|Kirbythestar}} Per all.
#{{User|FireBabyLuigi11}} Good article....me likey!
#{{User|Cat91x}} The article is well written so it should stay featured.


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
Line 23: Line 28:
:::Alright, I'll use the [[Koopalings]] as an example. It describes each of the Koopalings, but does it need to? According to you, no. {{User|Reversinator}}
:::Alright, I'll use the [[Koopalings]] as an example. It describes each of the Koopalings, but does it need to? According to you, no. {{User|Reversinator}}
::::The article on the Koopalings describes all the Koopalings because well... the article is about all the Koopalings. This article is about the Wii, not its games. {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
::::The article on the Koopalings describes all the Koopalings because well... the article is about all the Koopalings. This article is about the Wii, not its games. {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
Referring to KS3's comment in Removal of Support/Oppose Votes: If Reversinator started the unfeature thing, his comment should stay there, I think. {{user|Mario jc}}
:Well, that's how unfeature nominations get defeated, as in the Princess Daisy unfeature nomination. {{user|KS3}}
::It' now 9 to 1. I think it should be ununfeatured(featured) now. {{user|FireBabyLuigi11}}

Latest revision as of 10:59, September 14, 2016

Wii

Wii was nominated to be unfeatured at 23:40, May 1 2010.

Wii failed unfeaturing requirements at 14:52, 10 August 2010, and is currently able to be renominated.

Remove Featured Article Status

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. Gamefreak75 (talk) We have separate pages for the games so the article won't get cluttered up. What do you mean to describe them anyway?
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I think a summary of all the games is nice, but it is not required in this article. Like what 65 said in the comments, this is an article about the Wii, not the games.
  3. Commander Code-8 (talk) Per the guys above me.
  4. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Uh, the description for the Virtual Console is here. And for the rest of your complaints, the guys above me nailed it.
  5. KS3 (talk) Per all.
  6. Byllant (talk) - I see no problem with this article, keep FA stats.
  7. Larryman (talk) - I do not see a problem with the article
  8. Kirbythestar (talk) Per all.
  9. FireBabyLuigi11 (talk) Good article....me likey!
  10. Cat91x (talk) The article is well written so it should stay featured.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments

GameFreak: Well, I think he meant to describe them like in the "series" articles. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

That's exactly what I mean. Reversinator (talk)
In my opinion, it seems rather unnecessary. Gamefreak75 (talk)
Alright, I'll use the Koopalings as an example. It describes each of the Koopalings, but does it need to? According to you, no. Reversinator (talk)
The article on the Koopalings describes all the Koopalings because well... the article is about all the Koopalings. This article is about the Wii, not its games. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

Referring to KS3's comment in Removal of Support/Oppose Votes: If Reversinator started the unfeature thing, his comment should stay there, I think. Mario jc (talk)

Well, that's how unfeature nominations get defeated, as in the Princess Daisy unfeature nomination. KS3 (talk)
It' now 9 to 1. I think it should be ununfeatured(featured) now. FireBabyLuigi11 (talk)
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/Unfeature/N1/Wii&oldid=2057115"