Talk:Jojora's friends: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Conjectural?: Indenting is a virtue.) |
m (→Name) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Conjectural?== | ==Conjectural?== | ||
Is this name conjectural? | Is this name conjectural? Also, we should have an image of all four "friends." -- {{User|Son of Suns}} | ||
:I don't think it qualifies, because it's obviously a generic name to talk about them all in one article. --[[User:Turkishcoffee|Turkishcoffee]] 06:29, 8 April 2010 (EDT) | :I don't think it qualifies, because it's obviously a generic name to talk about them all in one article. --[[User:Turkishcoffee|Turkishcoffee]] 06:29, 8 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
==Name== | |||
Is this article name conjectural? Because if it is, we should move it to 'Jojora's friends', due to [[MarioWiki:Naming#Capitalization|this policy]]. {{User:Hewer/sig}} 03:13, May 20, 2021 (EDT) | |||
:Seems to be conjectural. Honestly, I think we should just make separate pages for each friend. They all have official names, so if there isn't an official blanket term for them, this page is completely unnecessary. {{User:Niiue/sig}} 04:27, May 20, 2021 (EDT) | |||
::The implication seems to be that they're all the same character, with the whole "choice" thing just being Jojora trolling (as she does). Also, having four mad-lib-identical pages is so redundant it potentially violates the [[MarioWiki:Once and only once|once and only once]] rule. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 04:29, May 20, 2021 (EDT) | |||
:::So what do we do if there's no official term for Jojora's friends as a whole? I've admittedly been away from the wiki lately, but it seems odd to create an unnecessary conjectural name for the sake of avoiding redundancy. {{User:Niiue/sig}} 06:27, May 20, 2021 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:09, June 3, 2021
Relation?[edit]
is Chucklissa related to Chuckya? WarioLoaf (talk)
- Chucklehuck Woods, read the article.
Para Yoshi Wahoo! 22:14, 12 January 2007 (EST)
Cool. We got an article. - User: Ultimatetoad
About the chucklissa- chuckya thing, just because the names sound the same doesn't mean they are related. I mean, Mario and Wario. Nintendo never confirmed they're relationship, and they're names sound the same. Maxlover2 3D, I signed!
Conjectural?[edit]
Is this name conjectural? Also, we should have an image of all four "friends." -- Son of Suns (talk)
- I don't think it qualifies, because it's obviously a generic name to talk about them all in one article. --Turkishcoffee 06:29, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
Name[edit]
Is this article name conjectural? Because if it is, we should move it to 'Jojora's friends', due to this policy. Hewer (talk · contributions · edit count) 03:13, May 20, 2021 (EDT)
- Seems to be conjectural. Honestly, I think we should just make separate pages for each friend. They all have official names, so if there isn't an official blanket term for them, this page is completely unnecessary. Niiue - Who has lost his tail? 04:27, May 20, 2021 (EDT)
- The implication seems to be that they're all the same character, with the whole "choice" thing just being Jojora trolling (as she does). Also, having four mad-lib-identical pages is so redundant it potentially violates the once and only once rule. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 04:29, May 20, 2021 (EDT)
- So what do we do if there's no official term for Jojora's friends as a whole? I've admittedly been away from the wiki lately, but it seems odd to create an unnecessary conjectural name for the sake of avoiding redundancy. Niiue - Who has lost his tail? 06:27, May 20, 2021 (EDT)
- The implication seems to be that they're all the same character, with the whole "choice" thing just being Jojora trolling (as she does). Also, having four mad-lib-identical pages is so redundant it potentially violates the once and only once rule. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 04:29, May 20, 2021 (EDT)
