Template talk:NES: Difference between revisions
Tag: Mobile edit |
LinkTheLefty (talk | contribs) |
||
(22 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===Move to <nowiki>{{FC}}</nowiki>=== | ===Move to <nowiki>{{FC}}</nowiki>=== | ||
#{{user|Super Mario RPG}} Secondary choice. | #{{user|Super Mario RPG}} Secondary choice. | ||
#{{User|LinkTheLefty}} Brevity is the soul of wit. | |||
===Move to <nowiki>{{FC/NES}}</nowiki>=== | ===Move to <nowiki>{{FC/NES}}</nowiki>=== | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
#{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Long overdue. | #{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Long overdue. | ||
#{{User|Sparks}} They're essentially the same thing, so having both names would definitely help. | #{{User|Sparks}} They're essentially the same thing, so having both names would definitely help. | ||
#{{User|Rykitu}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|EvieMaybe}} per proposal | |||
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Bro3256}} Here's the thing, the Famicom and NES run on the same hardware but are configured differently between the two. I'd consider both to be under the same general 8-bit Nintendo platform but I wouldn't call one or the other to be indicative of the platform as a whole. For the purposes of this wiki, I think keeping them in the same template is the better option and renaming it to FC/NES would be more clear. | |||
===Keep it as <nowiki>{{NES}}</nowiki>=== | ===Keep it as <nowiki>{{NES}}</nowiki>=== | ||
#{{User|Shy Guy on Wheels}} if it ain't broke don't fix it. | |||
#{{User|Starluxe}} I think this change harms more than it helps... | |||
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per SGoW, I don't see a need for the change. | |||
#{{User|Arend}} Current name for nav template is fine, since this is an English Wiki, and <nowiki>{{FC}}</nowiki> could work just fine as a redirect. I'm also not really fond of the <nowiki>{{FC/NES}}</nowiki> or <nowiki>{{FCNES}}</nowiki> option, since that would mean we might have to treat other nav templates the same way, such as moving {{tem|SMB2}} to <nowiki>{{SMB2/SMUSA}}</nowiki> / <nowiki>{{SMB2SMUSA}}</nowiki>, or {{tem|SMB}} to <nowiki>{{SMB/SMB2/SMBTLL}}</nowiki> / <nowiki>{{SMBSMB2SMBTLL}}</nowiki>, or even {{tem|SM3DW}} to <nowiki>{{SMB3DW/SM3DW+BF}}</nowiki> / <nowiki>{{SMB3DWSM3DWBF}}</nowiki>. It gets too convoluted and confusing. | |||
#{{User|Shadow2}} This is superfluous, as most readers wouldn't even see the change. What does it matter what the template is called so long as it gets the basic idea across to editors? | |||
#{{User|Cadrega86}} Unnecessary change, per Arend and Shadow2. | |||
#{{User|Altendo}} Per Arend. | |||
#{{User|Ahemtoday}} Navbox template names are all abbreviations anyway, so I don't really see the purpose in updating every page with this template to append a second name to it in the backend that nobody browsing the wiki will ever actually see. | |||
#{{User|LadySophie17}} Good points raised. Adding this as my secondary option since I'm ok with things staying as they are as well. | |||
#{{User|Jdtendo}} Navbox names should be very simple, easily guessable abbreviations. Editors should not have to wonder "Wait, is this <nowiki>{{NES/FC}} or {{FC/NES}}</nowiki> again?". | |||
#{{user|Terrenebrick699}} very unnecessary ngl, better if we just leave it as is | |||
#{{User|Platform}} Invisible to readers so it's pointless. | |||
===Comments (Renaming the template)=== | ===Comments (Renaming the template)=== | ||
The template header has since been changed to include the Famicom Disk System. Which means that option 2 (rename to <nowiki>{{FC/NES}}</nowiki> is no longer accurate. I don't know what to do now. I could update option 2 to include the Disk System (probably as <nowiki>{{FC/FCDS/NES}}</nowiki>, but I think I would prefer to simply not include the Disk System in the header or name. Opinions? {{User:LadySophie17/sig}} 09:17, December 22, 2024 (EST) | |||
:I changed it back, I should wait until this proposal ends to do something like that. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 13:24, December 22, 2024 (EST) | |||
{{@|Starluxe}} what harm do you think this proposal would cause? {{User:LadySophie17/sig}} 09:17, December 22, 2024 (EST) | |||
:The change is just unneeded and it just looks too cluttered for it to be considered helpful. And this is an English wiki, so we should default to the English name. {{User:Starluxe/sig}} 05:50, December 24, 2024 (EDT) | |||
I at least think Famicom needs to be a separate navigation box because the two are different consoles, just very similar. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 16:57, December 30, 2024 (EST) | |||
:Ish there is that there's too much overlap with the templates' subjects. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 17:10, December 30, 2024 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 14:11, January 4, 2025
Rename[edit]
@Bro3256 Perhaps this template can be renamed to "Famicom" since most of the releases originated from there before making its way to the NES. Super Mario RPG (talk) 15:19, June 1, 2024 (EDT)
- To be honest if this were to be renamed than I would suggest something like "FC/NES" to reflect the visible name displayed on the template. --Bro3256 (talk) 18:31, December 5, 2024 (EST)
Rename the NES Template[edit]
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Sunday, January 5, 2025, 12:03 GMT
The discussion above is short enough that I wouldn't like to just repeat it, but we have three options:
- Move to {{FC}}, since the Famicom predates the NES by two years. It's worth noting that the console's full name is Family Computer, hence the abbreviation I chose.
- Move to {{FC/NES}}, since it better reflects the actual name at the header of the template. If, for whatever reason, the use of the slash is not allowed in a template, then {{FCNES}} would be used instead.
- Keep it as {{NES}}. No further change.
Proposer: LadySophie17 (talk)
Deadline: January 4, 2025, 23:59 GMT
Move to {{FC}}[edit]
- Super Mario RPG (talk) Secondary choice.
- LinkTheLefty (talk) Brevity is the soul of wit.
Move to {{FC/NES}}[edit]
- LadySophie17 (talk) My preferred option.
- Super Mario RPG (talk) Long overdue.
- Sparks (talk) They're essentially the same thing, so having both names would definitely help.
- Rykitu (talk) Per all.
- EvieMaybe (talk) per proposal
- ThePowerPlayer (talk) Per all.
- Bro3256 (talk) Here's the thing, the Famicom and NES run on the same hardware but are configured differently between the two. I'd consider both to be under the same general 8-bit Nintendo platform but I wouldn't call one or the other to be indicative of the platform as a whole. For the purposes of this wiki, I think keeping them in the same template is the better option and renaming it to FC/NES would be more clear.
Keep it as {{NES}}[edit]
- Shy Guy on Wheels (talk) if it ain't broke don't fix it.
- Starluxe (talk) I think this change harms more than it helps...
- Waluigi Time (talk) Per SGoW, I don't see a need for the change.
- Arend (talk) Current name for nav template is fine, since this is an English Wiki, and {{FC}} could work just fine as a redirect. I'm also not really fond of the {{FC/NES}} or {{FCNES}} option, since that would mean we might have to treat other nav templates the same way, such as moving {{SMB2}} to {{SMB2/SMUSA}} / {{SMB2SMUSA}}, or {{SMB}} to {{SMB/SMB2/SMBTLL}} / {{SMBSMB2SMBTLL}}, or even {{SM3DW}} to {{SMB3DW/SM3DW+BF}} / {{SMB3DWSM3DWBF}}. It gets too convoluted and confusing.
- Shadow2 (talk) This is superfluous, as most readers wouldn't even see the change. What does it matter what the template is called so long as it gets the basic idea across to editors?
- Cadrega86 (talk) Unnecessary change, per Arend and Shadow2.
- Altendo (talk) Per Arend.
- Ahemtoday (talk) Navbox template names are all abbreviations anyway, so I don't really see the purpose in updating every page with this template to append a second name to it in the backend that nobody browsing the wiki will ever actually see.
- LadySophie17 (talk) Good points raised. Adding this as my secondary option since I'm ok with things staying as they are as well.
- Jdtendo (talk) Navbox names should be very simple, easily guessable abbreviations. Editors should not have to wonder "Wait, is this {{NES/FC}} or {{FC/NES}} again?".
- Terrenebrick699 (talk) very unnecessary ngl, better if we just leave it as is
- Platform (talk) Invisible to readers so it's pointless.
Comments (Renaming the template)[edit]
The template header has since been changed to include the Famicom Disk System. Which means that option 2 (rename to {{FC/NES}} is no longer accurate. I don't know what to do now. I could update option 2 to include the Disk System (probably as {{FC/FCDS/NES}}, but I think I would prefer to simply not include the Disk System in the header or name. Opinions? — Lady Sophie (T|C) 09:17, December 22, 2024 (EST)
- I changed it back, I should wait until this proposal ends to do something like that. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 13:24, December 22, 2024 (EST)
@Starluxe what harm do you think this proposal would cause? — Lady Sophie (T|C) 09:17, December 22, 2024 (EST)
- The change is just unneeded and it just looks too cluttered for it to be considered helpful. And this is an English wiki, so we should default to the English name. Starluxe 05:50, December 24, 2024 (EDT)
I at least think Famicom needs to be a separate navigation box because the two are different consoles, just very similar. Super Mario RPG (talk) 16:57, December 30, 2024 (EST)
- Ish there is that there's too much overlap with the templates' subjects. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 17:10, December 30, 2024 (EST)