Template talk:SMB: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Asking if SMB 35 can have a row here just so that Enemy clone has a navigation template) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{talk}} | {{talk}} | ||
Can ''[[Super Mario Bros. 35]]'' have it's own row on this template? I just random paged onto [[Enemy clone]] and the sight of a page with no navboxes hurts my soul. I kid, I kid, but it feels really strange to have that any article just float around without a navbox. While mixing it is a bad idea for similar reasons to [[Template:DK]] discussed [[Template talk:DK#Split between classic and Game Boy versions|here]], surely a entirely separate row isn't so bad? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 18:40, November 2, 2024 (EDT) | Can ''[[Super Mario Bros. 35]]'' have it's own row on this template? I just random paged onto [[Enemy clone]] and the sight of a page with no navboxes hurts my soul. I kid, I kid, but it feels really strange to have that any article just float around without a navbox. While mixing it is a bad idea for similar reasons to [[Template:DK]] discussed [[Template talk:DK#Split between classic and Game Boy versions|here]], surely a entirely separate row isn't so bad? [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 18:40, November 2, 2024 (EDT) | ||
:Not at all, I approve the adding of those two elements (being the [[Enemy clone]] and the [[POW Block]]), with his own "asterisk". Let's try [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Template%3ASMB&type=revision&diff=4420710&oldid=4418972 this] --{{User:Mariuigi_Khed/sig}} 11:37, November 3, 2024 (EST) | |||
::mmm, still feeling iffy. As I understand it, SMB 35 is less "rerelease", "remake", or "reissue" and more "we took the existing game and put it into a new genre". It might be farther out than DK the arcade game compared to DK the Game Boy game. Counterpoint, of course, is that 35 has the same levels as the original. [[User:Salmancer|Salmancer]] ([[User talk:Salmancer|talk]]) 11:34, November 6, 2024 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:34, November 6, 2024
Enemy Clones and other objects[edit]
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Can Super Mario Bros. 35 have it's own row on this template? I just random paged onto Enemy clone and the sight of a page with no navboxes hurts my soul. I kid, I kid, but it feels really strange to have that any article just float around without a navbox. While mixing it is a bad idea for similar reasons to Template:DK discussed here, surely a entirely separate row isn't so bad? Salmancer (talk) 18:40, November 2, 2024 (EDT)
- Not at all, I approve the adding of those two elements (being the Enemy clone and the POW Block), with his own "asterisk". Let's try this --
Mariuigi Khed 11:37, November 3, 2024 (EST)
- mmm, still feeling iffy. As I understand it, SMB 35 is less "rerelease", "remake", or "reissue" and more "we took the existing game and put it into a new genre". It might be farther out than DK the arcade game compared to DK the Game Boy game. Counterpoint, of course, is that 35 has the same levels as the original. Salmancer (talk) 11:34, November 6, 2024 (EST)
