Category talk:Animate objects: Difference between revisions
m (PorpleBot moved page Category talk:Animate Objects to Category talk:Animate objects: Text replacement - " Objects$" to " objects") |
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Delete this category == | == Delete this category == | ||
{{ | {{Settled TPP}} | ||
{{ | {{Proposal outcome|cancelled}} | ||
The category's and the comments above make it clear that its premise is vague and confusing. Why is this category even a thing? You could argue that a lot of things are animate: [[Goomba]]s, [[Koopa Troopa]]s, [[Cheep Cheep]]s, and even Mario himself. All in all, this category is too vague to even exist, and should just be deleted. | The category's and the comments above make it clear that its premise is vague and confusing. Why is this category even a thing? You could argue that a lot of things are animate: [[Goomba]]s, [[Koopa Troopa]]s, [[Cheep Cheep]]s, and even Mario himself. All in all, this category is too vague to even exist, and should just be deleted. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::Those have their own categories, which could probably stand to be subcategories of this. Anyway, your argument doesn't hold up. The whole point of the category is that they're species based on normally ''in''animate objects. Goombas, Koopas, etc. are not objects. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 19:15, 28 May 2018 (EDT) | ::Those have their own categories, which could probably stand to be subcategories of this. Anyway, your argument doesn't hold up. The whole point of the category is that they're species based on normally ''in''animate objects. Goombas, Koopas, etc. are not objects. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 19:15, 28 May 2018 (EDT) | ||
:::You ''do'' bring up good points. I've cancelled this proposal. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 19:30, 28 May 2018 (EDT) | :::You ''do'' bring up good points. I've cancelled this proposal. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 19:30, 28 May 2018 (EDT) | ||
== All entries not showing == | |||
Some entries in this category are not appearing properly. Moe-Eye, for example, is a member of this category but does not show in the list. --[[Special:Contributions/157.21.14.65|157.21.14.65]] 12:43, September 2, 2021 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:31, May 31, 2024
Before I continue to start placing more of these categories on more page, anybody have any comments?Knife (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2007 (EST)
- Um.. rather stupid.
3D, yeh, like anyone listens to ME.. - Anybody at all?Knife (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2007 (EST)
Does anyone have a reason, does it warrant deletion?Knife (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2007 (EST)
Well, it seems somewhat useful for things like Trapdoors and Dumb Drum. -- Sir Grodus
Minis[edit]
Do Minis count as animate objects? Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
Delete this category[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
canceled by proposer
The category's and the comments above make it clear that its premise is vague and confusing. Why is this category even a thing? You could argue that a lot of things are animate: Goombas, Koopa Troopas, Cheep Cheeps, and even Mario himself. All in all, this category is too vague to even exist, and should just be deleted.
Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: June 11, 2018, 23:59 GMT
Date Withdrawn: May 29, 2018, 22:29 GMT
Support[edit]
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
Oppose[edit]
Comments[edit]
Species and characters based on objects in the Mario universe. I mean, it makes sense to me. 
19:06, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
- But why doesn't Bob-omb and Bullet Bill appear in this category? They're "animate" objects to me.
(T|C) 19:10, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
- Those have their own categories, which could probably stand to be subcategories of this. Anyway, your argument doesn't hold up. The whole point of the category is that they're species based on normally inanimate objects. Goombas, Koopas, etc. are not objects.
19:15, 28 May 2018 (EDT)
- Those have their own categories, which could probably stand to be subcategories of this. Anyway, your argument doesn't hold up. The whole point of the category is that they're species based on normally inanimate objects. Goombas, Koopas, etc. are not objects.
All entries not showing[edit]
Some entries in this category are not appearing properly. Moe-Eye, for example, is a member of this category but does not show in the list. --157.21.14.65 12:43, September 2, 2021 (EDT)
