Talk:Underwhere Road
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Underwhere Road article. It is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Comments such as "Mario is my favorite character" are not allowed and will be removed on sight. Please use the Mario Boards or our Discord server to talk about Underwhere Road.
If you do have a question or comment about the article, please remember to sign your edit with ~~~~.
(First topic)[edit]
Ugh. I can't remember the group name of the three hags in this level...does anyone else? -LinkIII
The Ancient Sisters of the Underwhere. Their names are Hagnes, Hagitha and Hagra. (I think) Lemmy Koopa Fan 16:51, 15 February 2010 (EST)
2 Bosses[edit]
It ins't the only chapter with 2 bosses, 5-4 and 8-4 also have two bosses. --PaperStriker 13:27, 8 November 2007 (EST)
2 Bosses[edit]
- Yes, but those are chapter bosses, so they don't count (no pun intended). However, 8-2 has two mini-bosses, which is what they are talking about. If you didn't understand why I wrote no pun intended, it's because I put but those are chapter bosses, so they don't count. which is a pun because the 8-4 chapter boss is Count Bleck, who is sometimes known as just count.:)M&L Beware my fury! 15:56, 28 January 2012 (EST)
Strange Room[edit]
I was going through the room where there's a bunch of "stairs" leading up to Dorguy the Second in 3D, and I saw a pipe. It lead to a large room with absolutely nothing in it, but I figured it must be significant to something, but no matter how hard I looked, I couldn't find anything. Does anyone else know what this room is for? Lemmy Koopa Fan 16:51, 15 February 2010 (EST)
Maybe you need to flip or use Tippi to locate a hidden thing!YoshiTron
23:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Rewrite?[edit]
I don't really think that the rewrite request is necessary. Only one person has seemingly complained so far, so they threw {{Rewrite}} on the page. I'd like to ask that more opinions are added on the matter on this talk page. This isn't a Talk Page Proposal, or anything; I feel that a TPP for such a matter would be a waste of time. I don't find the article to need a rewrite, and I can understand it perfectly fine. Although that is just my opinion, I feel that this needs discussion. · SMB (Talk) · 00:44, 5 April 2010 (EDT)
- I'd place it back if I were you. The grammar is pretty messy. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- I gave the article a bit of a rewrite just now. Does the tag need to be put back, or is it better? If not, I'd be happy to make more changes if any need to be made. · SMB (Talk) · 20:21, 5 April 2010 (EDT)
- It's all good now. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- I gave the article a bit of a rewrite just now. Does the tag need to be put back, or is it better? If not, I'd be happy to make more changes if any need to be made. · SMB (Talk) · 20:21, 5 April 2010 (EDT)
- Huh? The rewrite thingy is back, but the content of this article has nothing that needs to be changed. Wonder why? There was only one mistake and I fixed it, but if that one mistake was the reason for the template, then why put the template up?M&L Beware my fury! 16:01, 28 January 2012 (EST)
