MarioWiki:Featured articles/N/Luigi's Mansion

Luigi's Mansion

Support

1. Paper Plumm (talk) Firstly, is Luigi's Mansion detailed? Every aspect of this game is covered thoroughly but in a way that isn't at risk of over explaining. There are relevant images for every single aspect and even colour coded links matching up with the areas for locations. In regard to appearances the article has a long and detailed list discussing its preceding and future references as well as a discussion on manga and potential future movie appearances. In addition, it passes the manual of style with flying colours and has no improvement tags or red links. Its intro paragraph does a solid job at introducing the topic. Speaking from a non-rule standpoint I truly feel this article has gone above and beyond and until I hear your objections, I truly see no reason why this can't rejoin the Featured Article family.
2. Killer Moth (talk) Page is very detailed and well written.
3. Tails777 (talk) Agreed. Detailed and shows everything that needs to be shown.
4. Wonder Time! (talk) Per all.
5. Yoshi18 (talk) Per all.
6. Nelsonic (talk) Per all.
7. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) - Wish I was able to get more models other than the Flying Fish, but I think I and the others did well on this one.

Comments

A bit of a silly question; is it like, overkill if we were to raise concerns about the List of Luigi's Mansion pre-release and unused content page in this? Every other subpage for the game itself, and the page for the game itself, are all up to code at worst and actively show some brilliance not seen elsewhere on the wiki--those color coded links are incredibly smart!--but the pre-release and unused content page has always been notoriously... iffy, mostly on the citation front, and it gives us a bit of pause to support the article itself being featured. ~Camwoodstock ( talk • contribs ) 00:04, April 11, 2025 (EDT)

i want to point out, some of those color-coded links are hiding redlinks under them. i do not know enough about luigi's mansion to fix them, but i don't think i'd support a featured article in that state. — eviemaybe (talk / contributions) 00:31, April 11, 2025 (EDT)

Thanks for both of your feedback! I want to make sure this article is worth its spot in the Featured Article section so I will gladly get this done. Could I ask for a bit more clarification for what you want citation wise, Camwoodstock? From a cursory glance I couldn’t really find what you’re describing. As for those missing hallways I’ll get right on those! User:Paper Plumm 13:33, April 13th, 2025 (EST)

In terms of sourcing, a few of the bullet points lack proper citations, and a lot of the images lack any citations at all. Making those hallway articles would be greatly appreciated, by the way! ~Camwoodstock ( talk • contribs ) 13:44, April 13, 2025 (EDT)

Reception section should be expanded on. Ray Trace^(T|C) 00:55, April 11, 2025 (EDT)

Similar question for you Ray, could you please specify what you would like done? User:Paper Plumm 13:39, April 13th, 2025 (EST)