MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/New Super Mario Bros.

New Super Mario Bros.

Support

1. MATEOELBACAN (talk) - I know that the sequel was nominated too soon but this one no, is well writed, and has tons of images, sections and tons of useful information.

Oppose

1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Yes, it is well written, but we could use images in the levels and story section, where images are vital. Story should be before the gameplay section as well. Otherwise, I don't see what's wrong with this article.
2. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - Per above with the fact of only one, two, three images throughout the page! (not including the gallery). You have to have many pics throughout the page to keep interest with the article readers. Users prefer to read an article that has pictures to aid them further with whatever they are seeking to learn! Other than that, it is about good.

Comments

Oh and FYI, "secuel" is spelled "sequel" and it's supposed to be well written, not writed. Just want to help you out and improve. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Ok, a minor grammar error of my comment :P and I changed the place of the Story section. MATEOELBACAN (talk)

BMB: Actually, in its current state, there are only 2 images in this entire article if one does not count the gallery section. I'd be pretty glad to help out with this thing, if I can. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)