Talk:Blooper (Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door)
Why should this get its own page? Because this seems to go against precedent (how we merged the Wigglers from the Mario & Luigi games recently). 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:46, 25 November 2016 (EST)
- Yeah, I was just thinking about it, The RPG Gamer (talk) should have create a proposal or discuss this topic before creating a page about it. In my opinion, it should have stay with the main Blooper page. This Blooper has nothing different in from generic Blooper (no physical difference/no different personnality). Despite being bigger, the game still calls it "Blooper" not "Giant Blooper" or something different that could characterized this Blooper as different. --
(TALK) 18:56, 25 November 2016 (EST)
Is it possible to merge this back with the main Blooper article considering that RPG Gamer didn't create a proposal or discuss about this to split this Blooper from the main Blooper article?--(TALK) 18:24, 26 November 2016 (EST)
- You can, but you'll have to get an admin to delete this page.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:12, 27 November 2016 (EST)
- I agree. For stuff like this, a proposal should've been made. This should be moved back.
14:15, 27 November 2016 (EST)
- I agree. For stuff like this, a proposal should've been made. This should be moved back.
=Necessary?
I still don't see why Big Squiddy here gets his own article. Yes, I know that it was because of a proposal but he's no different than other Big Bloopers. You could maybe make the argument that it's because his tentacles are fought separately and then you fight him but some other Mario games like DDR depict the tentacles as separate as well. To me, this is completely unnecessary. PrincessPeachFan (talk) 08:29, August 25, 2024 (EDT)
