MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Coin Rush

Support

1. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Very detailed for a petty article (it covers the cost of each pack), with lots of good-quality pictures.
2. Mariobros1985 (talk)
3. YoshiCookie (talk)
4. Calztchi (talk)

Oppose

1. MarioSmasher (talk) – I am not sure if this can become a FA: there are more packs likely to come, and it's best to keep it as a non-FA, until the end of the world comes Nintendo will become lazy the service ends.
2. SmartYoshi (talk) No. No way. Too short.

Removal of Opposes

SmartYoshi (talk)

1. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) So what if it's short? What matters is that it has good details (not spam)! It's not even that short, anyway!
2. YoshiKong (talk) Per Electrical dude, it is up to date and complete with all info currently available.

MarioSmasher (talk)

1. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk)I appreciate how you didn't pull any punches, but the article is great already, and it'll be even better when those packs are released.
2. Marshal Dan Troop (talk) Bowser's going to appear in games yet he's been featured...so unless we need to unfeature him we can't deny featured article rights to this article.
3. YoshiKong (talk) Per all.

Comments

There is likely to be more Coin Rush packs to come, so maybe it is best to nominate this at a later time. But it's up to you. YoshiKong (talk) 08:15, 2 December 2012 (EST)

@ElectricalBowserJr What do you mean by "pull any punches"? Please explain, thank you. MarioSmasher (talk)

Oh great, we make an article that will expand even more a FA. Take a look at Mario. It could be a FA, but it can't as more games come and we have to add info for them. Same for this. More packs will come and we have to add, add, add… MarioSmasher (talk)

SmartYoshi's vote is in fact valid because the rules say be of reasonable length, and not marked as a stub. therefore he can argue that being too short is a reason to reject a FA. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)