Talk:Giant Bowser

Is this article's title conjectural? I know the SSBM deal makes it at least part conjecture... YELLOWYOSHI398

Did you say "Part Conjecture"?
I am Confused 22:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

You know, half conjecture; half not. There's a whole template for that. YELLOWYOSHI398

Um... Merge with Bowser??? Max2 (talk)

I definitly say merge...... - Ultimatetoad

Yeah, merging it with Bowser would make a lot of sense. Keep the screenshot though :P - My Bloody Valentine

If it's a conjectural form, then it should be merged. ^Plumber 15:16, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

I'd have to disagee with the merge. Hope I'm not becoming A Link to the Past. Paper Jorge! I give paper cuts so stand back!

I'd say merge. But then again, we do have Giant Baby Bowser.Knife (talk) 17:20, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

I request a merge with Bowser! My Bloody Valentine

My opinion here is the same as in the Giant DK article. Besides, Giant Bowser is a boss in Melee and in New Super Mario Bros. So we should keep it. And I'm not saying this just because I wrote this article. --Xeze 07:19, 6 February 2008 (EST)

I'd say merge. Maybe a proposal is in order? HyperToad@Giant Bowser

That name isn't even official. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 16:26, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

Merge Giant Bowser to Bowser

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Friday, January 10, 2025, 15:55 GMT

I really don't see any reason to separate Giant Bowser from Bowser, since the two are clearly one and the same.

Proposer: M&SG (talk)
Voting Start: March 20, 2011 23:59 GMT
Deadline: April 5, 2011 23:59 GMT

Support

1. M&SG (talk) - Per my proposal.

Oppose

1. Yoshidude99 (talk) They are different so this should stay.