Talk:Main Page/Archive 5

4000 Articles

Unfortunately, I could not identify the 4000th article itself. I'll find the 5000th for sure. :) Wa _T^C_@^Y 14:11, 28 January 2007 (EST)

Knife has informed me it's Balloon Bully.

— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wayoshi (talk).

YAY! I made the 4000th! 3D, wahoo!

'Shroom Deadline

The second issue of the 'Shroom is set to come out this Saturday. I post the message here in hopes that people will notice before I add a section in their talk pages tomorrow. Wa _T^C_@^Y 13:36, 30 January 2007 (EST)

Microsoft

Now that Banjo and Conker are part of the wiki, shouldnt we include some Microsoft information? - User: Ultimatetoad

Maybe, personally I never saw the point on having information on the companies and gaming systems. -- Sir Grodus

Me neither. I want to focus on the games. But if we do focus on the companies, I just wondered if we should do Microsoft. - User: Ultimatetoad

Canonical: DKR or DKRDS?

I took notice some individuals question the canonancy of DKR + DKRDS and it would require removal of the BK artiles we have worked hard of making. Well unless an official source is stated that the N64 version is non-canon, i beleive the Banjo articles and Conker articles should stay. Agree? -- WarioLoaf (talk) 15:49, 2 February 2007 (EST)

Check out the latest at MarioWiki talk:Importance Policy. The issue is that, not to my knowledge before, the DS version is a complete remake: it's almost all the same, with better graphics and some new unlockables. Of course, the DS version replaces Banjo and Conker with Tiny and Dixie, now that Rare is separate from Nintendo. If DKRDS is more canonical, Banjo & Conker get the boot from this wiki. Opinions? Wa _T^C_@^Y 15:54, 2 February 2007 (EST)

• How would you tell its canacal???? Its all in a matter of opinion and they should stay until its iofficial one is canon the other isn't, that goes to SM64DS. Its booting Conker and Banjo from the wiki for no reason. -- WarioLoaf (talk) 16:34, 2 February 2007 (EST)