Talk:Hotel Mario

Poor voice acting and bizarre format?

Is that not an opinion? MamaWaluigi 16:29, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

Critic opinion.Knife (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

Well ,it is. But it's the general consencus. Gofer

Not really. Why, then, is it used in Youtube Poop, then? MamaWaluigi 13:58, 21 August 2007 (EDT)

I'm pretty sure that's exactly why it's used in YouTube Poop.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hammerthingys42 (talk).

Regardless, critic opinions should be properly referenced with reference tags. Stumpers! 18:24, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Ooh 4 fingers! Birdoshi

Wikipedia?

This article looks exactly like the one on Wikipedia. Luigifan123

That's called a Wikidump. - Walkazo 22:46, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Oh, thanks for telling me. Luigifan123

Credits

Are the credits really necessary?

Ralphfan>>Waste of space, in my opinion.

Sorry to bring up this tired debate but...

Mark Graue acknowledge the existence of Youtube Poops, albeit indirectly:

"I think it’s very cool ( and flattering ) that something that was recorded in 1993 has found new life on [YouTube videos that are using Mario & Luigi’s voice for their comedic video collages]."

So yeah, thoughts?--Blitzwing 18:07, 20 April 2009 (EDT)

This is very interesting. Not only should Marc have his own aticle me thinks, but maybe a reference of Youtube Poops somewhere in the wiki would be nice. Anyone agree? Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·

I agree with Jorge. Master Lucario The Aura is with me...

I agree as well. — Stooben Rooben 17:06, 21 April 2009 (EDT)

Yes, also i must agree Castle Toad (talk)

Copyright?

"It is illegal to make unauthorized copies of this software. Duplication of this software for any reason including sale, loan, rental, or gift is a crime. Penalties include fines of up to $50,000.00 and jail terms up to 5 years."

Wouldn't all YouTube poopers be breaking the law then? I'm a youtube pooper myself so someone please say no! Check my YouTube Channel: In the House Productions
The preceding unsigned comment was added by MamaLuigiDinner (talk).

All YouTube poopers of THAT software would be, yes. If you're not using that software, just let the violators get on with it. Also, please ~~~~ after your comment.--Launchballer 16:07, 24 May 2010 (EDT)