MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Rabbid Rosalina

Rabbid Rosalina

Support

1. Sparks (talk) I have worked really hard on improving Rabbid Rosalina's article, especially today. This is what it was before I started working on it today. I will admit that Rabbid Rosalina doesn't have as much history as Edge does, another character I featured months ago. I think all of the necessary information for her is here, but if I missed anything please let me know. This is something I've wanted to do for a while as well, and I worked really really hard today. On an unrelated note. Happy New Year 2024 everyone!
2. Mario (talk)
3. Ray Trace (talk)
4. Shoey (talk)
5. Killer Moth (talk) Just looked through the article and it looks to be in great shape.

Comments

Solid article. Well-formatted and seems like the information presented is great enough. The relationships with other characters is a bit different from the standard way MarioWiki does it. I would recommend summarizing her overall interactions with others and then list more in detail which relationships are more explored in the games, but it's a good start. Personality section should go under a "general information" section, see how Rosalina is organized for quick reference. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 17:27, January 1, 2024 (EST)

Got it. I'll take a look and improve from there! Sparks (talk) 17:29, January 1, 2024 (EDT)

Oh also I recommend you make the edits to reorganize the relationships with other characters in Edge as well. We don't really do run-downs per character and we overhauled how it was done a while back. See proposal from 2013 for more information. There's no urgency in the recommendation, so take your time. 👍🏻 It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 17:31, January 1, 2024 (EST)

Information is much more organized, and the relationships are much better as well (same thing for Edge)! Anything else that could be improved upon? Sparks (talk) 9:00, January 2, 2024 (EDT)

We're a little on-the-fence about our vote... This is basically the perfect article length, it goes in-depth in showcasing the unique abilities they have and their mechanics while still using the conservation of detail so as to not overexplain, its history and general information are similarly in-depth without being too flowery, the article itself is basically flawless! ...It's literally just the length of the gallery that irks us. Surely with 34 images--yes, we counted--we can split this off into its own gallery subpage and just feature a few key images in the article itself, right? Given this is such a trivial fix and we don't see anything saying about what makes a gallery "too long" beyond the nebulous "when it becomes a performance issue", we refuse to oppose and hold things up just on the basis of a very loosey-goosey reason that varies from person to person anyways, but we'd like to see that addressed before giving our approval; the article's near flawless otherwise, but that one thing does irk us a bit, and we wanna make sure we're not overstepping anything if we either implement that ourselves, or if someone else does it before we do. ~Camwoodstock (talk) 22:23, January 4, 2024 (EST)