MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Petey Piranha

Petey Piranha

Support

1. Luigibros2 Very Good article with good in formation and plenty of images and come on who doesen't love Petey?
2. HyperToad Good article, but loving him isn't the issue.
3. Explosive Pants Modifier this article rules, but im not a big fan of Petey Piranha.
4. Meat Knight w00t Petey, he has a great article.
5. MisterJaffffey G0 Featured articles/N1/Petey Piranha Petey ROCKS! (as suggested by my sig/page).
6. Per All!! User:Snifit123
7. DragonFeather 11:03, 23 February 2008 (EST)
8. André, Do your homework !!! 09:18, 2 March 2008 (EST) Per everyone!
9. User:WaluigiRocks It's a good article w/ good info and alot of photos and also PETEY RULEZ!!! P.s infectedshroom you oppose everything:(
10. User:WiseWarrior I think that's a great idea, Petey Piranha should get the spotlight!
11. Paper Pikachu Per all.
12. Very good article with lots of information!Darth Waluigi 21:53, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
13. Blue Koop^C It's a very good artical!!!!!!!!!!!@!!!!~!~~!!!!@@@#@!!~~!@@#
14. Glitz Hawk Per all.
15. -- itameaMarioFan It's written great, organized like a true professional and a lot of sources. Some details are missing, but I still love the character.
16. user:Yoshitheawesome Per all.
17. Ninjayoshi - Per all and this article is well written. Also, So I hErD u LiKe PeTyZ!

Oppose

1. BLOC PARTIER. Make the M&L:PiT, Super Princess Peach, Mario Golf: TT, and Mario Pinball sections bigger. Also, add stuff about the Pirahna Bean. Also... Add an "Other Appearances" section for games like Mario Strikers, baseball, etc. Er, NVM.
2. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)· Per Infected. We need more info on his appearances in those games.
3. Toadster_04 Per IS. Also some paragraphs are not very descriptive or confusing to read. For example, it says in his Strikers appearance his Mega Strike is very unique, yet does not in any way describe how it is so.

Comments

Luigibros2 Hyper Toad I know that isn't the issue I'm just saying it to say it -_-'

Snifit123: I don't think your reason for opposing is detailed enough. Please state which info is missing exactly, otherwise your vote will be removed. Time Questions 11:23, 26 January 2008 (EST)

I didn't want you to turn your oppose vote into a support if you're not satisfied with the article, but it's your decision... Time Questions 09:10, 1 February 2008 (EST)

Uh... is there supposed to be a animated image on articles? Boo der dash 18:03, 18 February 2008 (EST)

If it's appropriate (which it is in this case), why not?
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pikax (talk).

I vote we get rid of the following fan votes: Jaffffey's (fan vote), DragonFeather's (no reason), and WiseWarrior's (fan vote). They do not pertain to the article. And WaluigiRocks: you are incorrect. I oppose things that I believe are not worthy of being featured. :P BLOC PARTIER.

WiseWarrior's vote might or might not refer to the article. But I oppose all of your "nominations." Time Questions 07:49, 27 May 2008 (EDT)

Here's another fault with the system: you don't need to give a reason. BLOC PARTIER.

You mean, when discussing whether or not a vote should be removed? Yeah, I'm taking advantage of this fault right now. :P Time Questions 18:54, 27 May 2008 (EDT)