Talk:Giant Kirby: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→Merge Giant Kirby to Kirby: My sense of time is messed up) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Proposer''': {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | *'''Proposer''': {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
*'''Deadline''': 10 March 2011 | *'''Deadline''': 10 March 2011 24:00 (GMT) | ||
===Merge it=== | ===Merge it=== | ||
Revision as of 23:02, February 23, 2011
Are pages like this actually needed? What's the big difference between Giant Kirby and a giant Kirby? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:31, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
I guess we should merge it. Just write down on Kirby's page: "after beating all of the Kirby's, a Giant Kirby will appear to battle the player". So, yeah, merge it. My Bloody Valentine
Merge Giant Kirby to Kirby
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Saturday, February 22, 2025, 10:17 GMT
I don't really see the point of separate articles like these when this character is simply a bigger version of Kirby with no distinct abilities other than size. We can mention a giant Kirby gets battled as a boss in Super Smash Bros. Melee in the Kirby article and things will still be fine.
If this proposal goes well, I'll suggest merging other characters that will warrant this, namely Giant Donkey Kong and Giant Bowser. We should also do this for consistent sake, since Giant Baby Bowser is a redirect, unlike the other giant characters.
- Proposer: BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- Deadline: 10 March 2011 24:00 (GMT)
