MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{UNFANOMSTAT | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=00:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | |nominated=00:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Has a tense template. | #{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Has a tense template. | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Although I have indeed fixed all of the tense errors, the excessive use of demonstratives ("there are, there is") is a major problem. What it does is that bores the reader if used too much. Also, there are a bunch of capitalization errors (I'm not sure if mandibug is supposed to be lower-cased, and shouldn't the names of the planets also be lower-cased?) that I stumbled across and did my best to correct them, but there's still quite a notorious amount of them. Bottom line: proof-read articles before you feature them! | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Although I have indeed fixed all of the tense errors, the excessive use of demonstratives ("there are, there is") is a major problem. What it does is that bores the reader if used too much. Also, there are a bunch of capitalization errors (I'm not sure if mandibug is supposed to be lower-cased, and shouldn't the names of the planets also be lower-cased?) that I stumbled across and did my best to correct them, but there's still quite a notorious amount of them. Bottom line: proof-read articles before you feature them! | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The writing just doesn't have the quality compared to other featured articles. Sometimes, we have to look how interesting the article is to read. This article has plenty of boring verbs. I know this isn't a narrative or something similar, but I believe phrases such as "there are" are too numerous in this article. I fixed up a bunch of errors, but I think the article still doesn't have that quality. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles|this]] page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | Wait, how come this article does not show up on [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles|this]] page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
Revision as of 20:57, December 2, 2010
Honeyhive Galaxy
Remove Featured Article Status
- Bowser's luma (talk) It has the "wrong verb tense" template on it, and that is against the rules for a FA.
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) Has a tense template.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Although I have indeed fixed all of the tense errors, the excessive use of demonstratives ("there are, there is") is a major problem. What it does is that bores the reader if used too much. Also, there are a bunch of capitalization errors (I'm not sure if mandibug is supposed to be lower-cased, and shouldn't the names of the planets also be lower-cased?) that I stumbled across and did my best to correct them, but there's still quite a notorious amount of them. Bottom line: proof-read articles before you feature them!
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) The writing just doesn't have the quality compared to other featured articles. Sometimes, we have to look how interesting the article is to read. This article has plenty of boring verbs. I know this isn't a narrative or something similar, but I believe phrases such as "there are" are too numerous in this article. I fixed up a bunch of errors, but I think the article still doesn't have that quality.
Keep Featured Article Status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Wait, how come this article does not show up on this page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
