MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Party 6: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Gamefreak75 (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Copied story, trivia section overly long and at the same time puns section is incomplete. | #{{user|Tucayo}} - Copied story, trivia section overly long and at the same time puns section is incomplete. | ||
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Board section needs expansion and per all. Unofortunately, I don't have the game, so I can't help this one out. | #{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Board section needs expansion and per all. Unofortunately, I don't have the game, so I can't help this one out. | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Even though the table was the work of me, I still don't think it's fine YET to get featured. Per all. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== |
Revision as of 13:46, March 14, 2010
Mario Party 6
Support
- KS3 (talk) A very good article, with no mistakes, plenty of pictures, and what an FA should look like.
Oppose
- Reversinator (talk) Let's see... Extremely small introduction, copied story, some bad grammar, missing punctuation, and short sections.
- Tucayo (talk) - Copied story, trivia section overly long and at the same time puns section is incomplete.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - Board section needs expansion and per all. Unofortunately, I don't have the game, so I can't help this one out.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Even though the table was the work of me, I still don't think it's fine YET to get featured. Per all.