MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mii

Mii

Support

1. Yoshario (talk) - This article is in-depth and detailed, covers all Mario-appearances, and has images to support it. I think its ready to become featured.
2. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - The Mii article is fitting to be featured. All the sections are nice and lengthy, not too short at all (maybe the Dr. Mario & Germbuster one). I say it would be nice to have it a featured article.
3. bowser jrs number 1 fan (talk)-the mii article should be a featured article its not that short and the sections are nice and lengthy but dr. mario and germ buster is a bit short.
4. Lu-igi board (talk) great article but the images are mostly poor.
5. Pie Shroom (talk) This article is well written and deserves to be an FA.
6. Mario64fanatic (talk) The article is well stated, for a character who is basiclly not a Mario character.
7. McQueenMario (talk) - It's good now.
8. Platitudinous (talk) It has all of the info I need on Miis in the Mario series.

Oppose

1. Mario64fanatic (talk)Per Edofenrir + Not only is the Dr. Mario and Germ Buster section to short, Mario Party 8 is too. I really don't get the idea of this being featured. Mario is 10 times the size of this article and chocks full of more information yet that's not featured and this is nominated! That's crazy. Also the last peice of trivia is false. I tried it and it failed. I say we don't feature it.
2. Bowser's luma (talk) - I like Miis, but I don't think this article is quality enough to become a FA. Part of the Mario Kart Wii section was rambly and I fixed it, but I still don't think it's as good as a FA should be.
3. Shyster66 (talk) Sections need to be bigger.
4. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) per Shyster66

Removal of Opposes

Mario64fanatic

1. Yoshario (talk) – The Dr. Mario and Germ Buster and Mario Party 8 sections are long enough because they only explain the minor roles of the Miis in the games. I have also removed the last piece of trivia and relocated the true trivia in the proper sections.

Removal of Opposes

Shyster66

1. Yoshario (talk) – Per my comment below.

Comments

I hate Miis, they are not even from the Marioverse! Ironnical that Mii will become an FA and Mario is not Tucayo (talk)

Well, if you recall that FAs are about the article's quality rather than its topic, it's not that ironical anymore. Time Q (talk)

The other "first picture" was Image:Mii.png. Should it be switched to that? –Yoshario (talk)

There was another one? Whoa, that one doesn't have random black lines all through it. Yes, switch it! Marioguy1 (talk)

@Marioguy1: I think Tucayo has a point here: FAs shouldn't be just extraordinary well written, they should be representative for the Marioverse, the very topic this wiki is about. I'm not saying that the whole FA nomination should be canceled because of this, but you shouldn't classify Tucayo's vote as invalid, for he at least has a point that needs to be thought about. - Edofenrir (talk)

Well, any character not part of the Mario series will have appearances outside the wiki. If that is so, it cannot become a featured article because it doesn't cover every single appearance. That's a requirement a Featured Article needs. -BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

The rules have been changed. Yoshario (talk)

The article has got some work-over, so a reconsideration has to be made. All the complaints I could afford now would be ones stained with my personal opinion, but that wouldn't be right. Therefore I am unable to sustain my opposal vote, and I'll remove it. My congratulations to the people who worked on this article. Good job. - Edofenrir (talk)

@Shyster66: The sections are fine. They cover the whole role of Miis in the game, even if it's minor. Yoshario (talk)