Category talk:Third-party characters

Real people

This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

I know that real people (e.g. Abraham Lincoln) aren't "third-party characters," but they aren't from the Super Mario franchise. It wouldn't sound right to call them third-party characters, so how would we make a similar category of real people who have appeared in Super Mario? I would say "Licensed characters" perhaps, since Mike Tyson was licensed for Punch Out!! in early releases; yes, this is not a Super Mario game, but it's the first example that occurred to mind. But would historical figures be "licensed" for inclusion? Or does "crossover" apply, since they are crossing over from real life into the world of Super Mario? Super Mario RPG (talk) 14:37, May 6, 2024 (EDT)

Subcategory for "third-party Super Mario characters"?

I've had the idea to create this subcategory ever since I first read this tweet. I was initially going to launch a proposal on implementing this and other alternative solutions to my issues with this category, but due to a combination of me not feeling confident my proposal would be supported at the time, the other options being impractical, and the possibility that this may not require a proposal at all, I scratched that plan and decided to discuss my idea here instead.

The current definition of this category is, per its description, "Characters who are not owned by Nintendo or any of its second-party companies, but who have appeared in the Super Mario franchise or in related crossovers." While this is perfectly reasonable for characters from non-Nintendo series like Sonic and Pac-Man, it feels quite awkward for characters like Geno and Timber, who originated in the Super Mario franchise and just happen to be owned by third-party companies (namely, Square Enix and Rare Ltd. respectively). To resolve this, I'd like to create a subcategory for the latter kind of third-party characters, which I'm tentatively calling Category:Third-party Super Mario characters. Its description would be something like:

Characters originating in the Super Mario franchise who are not owned by Nintendo or any of its second-party companies.

While the original characters of Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars would feel right at home in this hypothetical subcategory, the Rare-owned characters of Diddy Kong Racing (excluding Banjo, Conker, and arguably Tiptup) are a little more dicey, as that game did not start out as a Donkey Kong game as Super Mario RPG did a Super Mario game. Still, given the results of the Fangamer proposal, it's fairly safe to consider these characters part of the Super Mario franchise.

My initial solution to this issue was to tighten the definition of this category to characters that are both not owned by Nintendo or its subsidiaries and come from a series also not owned by them, but it felt highly disingenuous to exclude characters that we know aren't owned by Nintendo, so I scrapped that. If you're wondering, my other ideas included creating a subcategory for characters for non-Nintendo series while leaving the third-party Super Mario characters in this one—the opposite of the idea I've settled on, and outright deleting this category. Yeah, no.

Do note that this wouldn't change what we count as a "third-party Super Mario character" to fit the aforementioned tweet, as there's no confirmation that Nintendo doesn't own the original characters from the Donkey Kong Country television series, The Super Mario Bros. Movie, etc. like there is with the original characters of Super Mario RPG and Diddy Kong Racing. If we do get confirmation of Nintendo not owning these characters, however, my idea may be necessary to keep this category from becoming even more bloated.

If you have any other ideas for this category, I'd be open to hear them! SolemnStormcloud (talk) 14:17, September 7, 2024 (EDT)

Makes sense. I think most people coming here would be looking for third-party crossovers, not Mario characters that happen to not be owned by Nintendo. (Also, are characters like Sergeant Flutter and Toadofsky really third-party? I figured Nintendo would own the rights since they're based on their designs, like Krunch.) -- Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 16:59, September 7, 2024 (EDT)

There's no confirmation that Nintendo still owns Sergeant Flutter and Toadofsky, but there's also no confirmation that they don't, either. I wouldn't consider them "third-party" unless we somehow get solid evidence proving otherwise. SolemnStormcloud (talk) 20:50, September 8, 2024 (EDT)

Counterargument to my previous comment: Kinoppe is a Toad who is confirmed to be owned by Kazuki Motoyama? Though, I think this can be resolved with a simple criterion: characters of Nintendo-original species must have explicit confirmation of them not being owned by Nintendo to be included in the subcategory. SolemnStormcloud (talk) 14:34, October 29, 2024 (EDT)

I got impatient waiting for additional feedback, so I created the category. Any further thoughts? SolemnStormcloud (talk) 23:37, December 21, 2024 (EST)