MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mt. Teapot: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ||
'''Lcrossmk8''' | '''Lcrossmk8''' | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Please read [[MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy|this]], [[MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy|this]], and [[MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Honeyhive Galaxy|that]]. This article fails rule number #11, in which an article "'''…be of reasonable length''' and not marked as a stub.", with bold for emphasis. Also, [[ | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Please read [[MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy|this]], [[MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy|this]], and [[MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Honeyhive Galaxy|that]]. This article fails rule number #11, in which an article "'''…be of reasonable length''' and not marked as a stub.", with bold for emphasis. Also, [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_47#Remove_the_eleventh_featured_article.2Flist_standard|read this proposal]] before you further comment. | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 23:29, January 22, 2018
Mt. Teapot
Remove featured article status
- Baby Luigi (talk) An unimpressive articles with pretty much the same problems as Rice Beach. If Rice Beach cannot be featured, so can't this article.
Keep featured article status
- Lcrossmk8 (talk) Your reasons are not very explanatory or solid. Also, I don't see many mistakes, if any, in this article---the conventions and grammar are all fine-tuned and top-notch, and the information is well-written, concise, clear, and straight.
Removal of support/oppose votes
Lcrossmk8
- Baby Luigi (talk) Please read this, this, and that. This article fails rule number #11, in which an article "…be of reasonable length and not marked as a stub.", with bold for emphasis. Also, read this proposal before you further comment.
