MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Mario Hoops 3-on-3: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (→|3}}) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Alex95}} - imo, needs a reception section. | #{{User|Alex95}} - imo, needs a reception section. | ||
#{{User|Time Turner}} Per BLOF. This is not passing with an improvement tag and an empty section. | |||
==== Removal of opposes ==== | ==== Removal of opposes ==== | ||
'''Alex95''' | '''Alex95''' |
Revision as of 21:30, December 23, 2017
Mario Hoops 3-on-3
Support
- DKPetey99 (talk) This article covers everything about the game. The character list looks nice, as well as the charts of different balls and items. It covers everything from the practice mode and for the other challenges. The article is also written very well and there are no templates for rewrites, construction, etc.I believe the state of this article reflects one of the best the Wiki has to offer, and deserves to be featured.
- Lcrossmk8 (talk) Yeah, I'm with Pete on this one. There are no construction or rewrite templates anywhere, and every part of the article is well-written, concise, clear, and pays strong attention to detail. This article most definitely deserves to be a featured article.
- YoshiStar28 (talk) Any construction templates? No. Any rewrite templates? No. So... IT'S OFFICIAL!
Oppose
- Alex95 (talk) - imo, needs a reception section.
- Time Turner (talk) Per BLOF. This is not passing with an improvement tag and an empty section.
Removal of opposes
Alex95
- Lcrossmk8 (talk) There are a lot of articles that do not have reception sections, so saying that this article shouldn't be featured because it doesn't have a reception section is contradictory.
Comments
I have several things to say about the article:
- The intro definitely needs to be expanded on. I could fill that in easily if you give me some time.
- The article could use a reception section.
- There are still empty sections, such the staff section. We can't have that in the article.
- I feel like the gameplay section could be expanded on even more detail, talking about the rules and the overall objective of the sport.
- Item image quality is not good quality. Are there any sprites ripped for that?
It's been a while since I last played the game, not sure if there's any missing information, so I may do some research here and there. Ray Trace(T|C) 20:42, 23 December 2017 (EST)