MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Paper Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Page is a no sig one) |
m (Added more information.) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Alex95}} If lack of red links is your only reason, I'm gonna say no. The page currently has a rewrite template and a construction template at the top, which goes against the [[MarioWiki:Featured_articles|rules for nomination]]. See also: [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Paper Mario]] | #{{User|Alex95}} If lack of red links is your only reason, I'm gonna say no. The page currently has a rewrite template and a construction template at the top, which goes against the [[MarioWiki:Featured_articles|rules for nomination]]. See also: [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Paper Mario]] | ||
#{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} I agree. Having a rewrite template on the page is against the nomination rules. Per Alex95. | #{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} I agree. Having a rewrite or construction template on the page is against the nomination rules. Also, I spotted a red link. Per Alex95. | ||
#{{User|Luigi 64DD}} Per all. | #{{User|Luigi 64DD}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} The article is still undergoing work to fix the issues it had when it became unfeatured. It's in no state to be re-featured at this current time. | #{{User|Yoshi876}} The article is still undergoing work to fix the issues it had when it became unfeatured. It's in no state to be re-featured at this current time. | ||
Revision as of 15:49, January 1, 2017
Paper Mario
Support
- MarioMario456 (talk) 155KB and no red links.
Oppose
- Alex95 (talk) If lack of red links is your only reason, I'm gonna say no. The page currently has a rewrite template and a construction template at the top, which goes against the rules for nomination. See also: MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Paper Mario
- Owencrazyboy9 (talk) I agree. Having a rewrite or construction template on the page is against the nomination rules. Also, I spotted a red link. Per Alex95.
- Luigi 64DD (talk) Per all.
- Yoshi876 (talk) The article is still undergoing work to fix the issues it had when it became unfeatured. It's in no state to be re-featured at this current time.
