Talk:Giant Bowser: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:16, July 26, 2007

Is this article's title conjectural? I know the SSBM deal makes it at least part conjecture... YELLOW YOSHI 398

Did you say "Part Conjecture"?
I am Confused 22:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

You know, half conjecture; half not. There's a whole template for that. YELLOW YOSHI 398

Um... Merge with Bowser??? Max2 (talk)

I definitly say merge...... - Ultimatetoad

Yeah, merging it with Bowser would make a lot of sense. Keep the screenshot though :P - My Bloody Valentine

If it's a conjectural form, then it should be merged. ^Plumber 15:16, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 07:01, July 15, 2007 (edit) Crocodile Dippy (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:16, July 26, 2007 (edit) (undo) Plumber (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Yeah, merging it with Bowser would make a lot of sense. Keep the screenshot though :P - {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}		Yeah, merging it with Bowser would make a lot of sense. Keep the screenshot though :P - {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}

			If it's a conjectural form, then it should be merged. {{User:Plumber/Pignature}} 15:16, 26 July 2007 (EDT)