Talk:Dark matter: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Trivia: new section) |
(→Trivia) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Do we really need that trivia? This is about a substance in the Mario series that is totally different from the theoretical Dark Matter other than the name. It explains a little too much about the non-Mario type, which is not what the article is about. If it's going to be kept at all, it should at least be reworded.<br> | Do we really need that trivia? This is about a substance in the Mario series that is totally different from the theoretical Dark Matter other than the name. It explains a little too much about the non-Mario type, which is not what the article is about. If it's going to be kept at all, it should at least be reworded.<br> | ||
{{User:Ultimate Mr. L/sig}} 12:20, 15 December 2016 (EST) | {{User:Ultimate Mr. L/sig}} 12:20, 15 December 2016 (EST) | ||
:I feel like just a wikipedia link on the name should be fine. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:30, 15 December 2016 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 12:30, December 15, 2016
Dark Matter vs. Antimatter
Technically, Dark matter is an un-reactive material. Antimatter is the stuff that will blow up, destroy, demolish etc. matter. Should this be stated? Arceus79 00:40, 24 March 2012 (EDT)
- I don't know of any instance where this can be really compared to what we know of in real life as "dark matter" in anything other than name. Bop1996 (Talk)
Trivia
Do we really need that trivia? This is about a substance in the Mario series that is totally different from the theoretical Dark Matter other than the name. It explains a little too much about the non-Mario type, which is not what the article is about. If it's going to be kept at all, it should at least be reworded.
(--) 12:20, 15 December 2016 (EST)
- I feel like just a wikipedia link on the name should be fine.
12:30, 15 December 2016 (EST)
