MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Blooper: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Boo Diddly (talk | contribs) m (Undo revision 1659361 by 189.231.240.52 (talk) wtf) |
(→Oppose) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#{{User|Mario}} At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the [[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy|Empty Section]] policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet. | #{{User|Mario}} At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the [[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy|Empty Section]] policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet. | ||
#{{User|Vommack}}Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section. | #{{User|Vommack}}Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section. | ||
#{{User|Fandro}} Per Mario and Vommack. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== |
Revision as of 14:51, May 3, 2014
Blooper
Support
- bluetoad63 (talk) No flowery stuff, nothing "captain obvious" like, and of good length. Only thing is the stub section, which can be expanded easily without padding, I think.
Oppose
- Baby Luigi (talk) Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.
- Mario (talk) At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the Empty Section policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.
- Vommack (talk)Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
- Fandro (talk) Per Mario and Vommack.