MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Blooper: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Undo revision 1659361 by 189.231.240.52 (talk) wtf)
Line 12: Line 12:
#{{User|Mario}} At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the [[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy|Empty Section]] policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.
#{{User|Mario}} At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the [[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy|Empty Section]] policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.
#{{User|Vommack}}Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
#{{User|Vommack}}Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
#{{User|Fandro}} Per Mario and Vommack.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Revision as of 14:51, May 3, 2014

Blooper

Support

  1. bluetoad63 (talk) No flowery stuff, nothing "captain obvious" like, and of good length. Only thing is the stub section, which can be expanded easily without padding, I think.

Oppose

  1. Baby Luigi (talk) Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.
  2. Mario (talk) At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the Empty Section policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.
  3. Vommack (talk)Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
  4. Fandro (talk) Per Mario and Vommack.

Removal of Opposes

Comments