MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Blooper

Blooper

Support

1. bluetoad63 (talk) No flowery stuff, nothing "captain obvious" like, and of good length. Only thing is the stub section, which can be expanded easily without padding, I think.

Oppose

1. Baby Luigi (talk) Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.
2. Mario (talk) At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the Empty Section policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.
3. Vommack (talk)Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
4. Fandro (talk) Per Mario and Vommack.

Removal of Opposes

Vommack

1. Mario (talk) The one-liners are reduced to a more reasonable amount, and the stub section has been sufficiently expanded. Your vote is now invalid.

Fandro

1. Stonehill (talk) ...which makes this vote invalid too.

Comments

I'm pretty sure most, if not all, problems are fixed, but considering the inactivity of this nomination, I think I'm going to renominate this the month after it fails (which is such a long time). Or, I can just ignore the damn rules. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:01, 16 May 2014 (EDT)

@Stonehill: Well, that vote is going to be automatically removed once that vote is removed... but IF more than one user, including a friggin' "admin", votes to remove that vote. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:33, 22 May 2014 (EDT)