Talk:Penguin

Penguins are FTW. ^{Plumber, darkgreen}

Bumpties are better. ^_^--Dreyfus2006 23:19, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

That can be debated. ^_^ ^Plumber 23:42, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Forum please. Oh, and Bumpties are way more FTWer than Penguins, no offense.Knife (talk) 23:50, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Yeah, you tell him... Wait, there's a forum!?--Dreyfus2006 00:37, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

Yeah, here. Xzelion^ETC

Please remember that the Talk for Penguin is for discussions about editing the Penguin article, not debating your opinion.

Thank you!

-

Penguin vs Bumpty Discussion

Alright, the debate is now here. Thanks for pointing the forum out, by the by.--Dreyfus2006 00:57, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

Trivia

I don't think the part about them being related to Bumpties is needed... Mr. Guy the Guy...^E

The Adventures of SMB3

Shouldn't this be under a different section?
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fg (talk).

Sub-/Related Species

What exactly is the logic behind which penguin enemies are listed as "sub-species" and which ones are "related species"? Why is Cooligan, for instance, a sub-species of penguin while Pendril is merely related? Is a Pendril somehow less of a penguin than a Cooligan? I'm confused :|--vellidragon 17:07, 26 April 2010 (EDT)

FourPaperHeroes has been adding speculative related species to speculative articles, like Penguin and Dragon. Hello, I'm Time Turner.

None of them is confirmed to be a sub-species. Should any penguin-like species really be included under "related species"? But anyway, isn't "related species" based on personal opinion? I could say that anything that resembles an octopus or squid is related to Blooper just because of their appearance. Do I have proof? No. --Grandy02 20:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)