MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Wario Land 4: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
I suggest you proofread it before featuring it. There has been a ''ton'' of featured articles in the past that has no proofreading whatsoever done in any that errors had to be created beforehand. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | I suggest you proofread it before featuring it. There has been a ''ton'' of featured articles in the past that has no proofreading whatsoever done in any that errors had to be created beforehand. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | ||
I haven't checked the article in-depth, but there are bits of POV ("[The game] enjoyed well-deserved praise") and odd writing ("The game got good reviews... [for] its general thrill of satisfaction" whaaaa?) in the intro. Not a good sign. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 08:44, 6 October 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:44, October 6, 2012
Wario Land 4
Support
- YoshiKong (talk) About a year ago, Wario Land 4 was a poorly written article with more stubs, red links and missing info than you could poke a keyboard at! Slowly, but surely, the 20+ stubs were expanded, all red links and missing info filled, and every page in it's category cleaned up and rewritten. So come on, lets get this great article the featured status it deserves!
- SmartYoshi (talk) Per YoshiKong.
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
I suggest you proofread it before featuring it. There has been a ton of featured articles in the past that has no proofreading whatsoever done in any that errors had to be created beforehand. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
I haven't checked the article in-depth, but there are bits of POV ("[The game] enjoyed well-deserved praise") and odd writing ("The game got good reviews... [for] its general thrill of satisfaction" whaaaa?) in the intro. Not a good sign. --Glowsquid (talk) 08:44, 6 October 2012 (EDT)
