MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/King Boo: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Comments) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Um, SuperFamicom, why did you remove the reason for this nomination? We need to know why you think this article merits a featured status. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | Um, SuperFamicom, why did you remove the reason for this nomination? We need to know why you think this article merits a featured status. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
:He probably got confused over the don't need a reason to surport rule or he didn't like people contradicting his argument it's one of those {{User|Raven Effect}} | :He probably got confused over the don't need a reason to surport rule or he didn't like people contradicting his argument it's one of those {{User|Raven Effect}} | ||
::His vote is invalid then if there is no reason to feature. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} |
Revision as of 20:20, March 7, 2012
King Boo
Support
Oppose
- New Super Yoshi (talk) Some sections are amazing (like the Luigi's Mansion Section) and others are poor (like the Mario Kart DS and Mario and Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games). The Mario Kart DS section is horribly written and the Mario and Sonic at the London 2012 Olympic Games section is too short.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) No, I think the Luigi's Mansion section is the one that needs a major rewrite. It feels too much like a romanticized heroic epic. There are way too many biased adjectives, such as "green-clad plumber", "magical", "incredible", "right-hand", "hulking beast", and so much more. The tense is not consistent and some sections in the Trivia can be either removed or relocated in the article.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
Just saying, you don't use N1 for making nominations. N1 is used for archives. If there is already a created page for it (most likely a redirect), put the active nomination in it. It has N instead. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
I added a rewrite template shortly after making my oppose vote. This template is used after the nomination is created, so saying stuff like, "lolz u didnt c teh temp plate so y u nomin8 it" is not valid. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Um, SuperFamicom, why did you remove the reason for this nomination? We need to know why you think this article merits a featured status. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- He probably got confused over the don't need a reason to surport rule or he didn't like people contradicting his argument it's one of those Raven Effect (talk)
- His vote is invalid then if there is no reason to feature. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)