User talk:B.wilson: Difference between revisions
(→Praise) |
m (→Mhm: new section) |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
I'd like to read the policy. If you can send me a link to it that'd be great! [[User:Spidey665|<font color="blue">'''Spidey'''</font>]][[User talk:Spidey665#top|<font color="red">''665''</font>]] 21:28, 18 December 2011 (EST) | I'd like to read the policy. If you can send me a link to it that'd be great! [[User:Spidey665|<font color="blue">'''Spidey'''</font>]][[User talk:Spidey665#top|<font color="red">''665''</font>]] 21:28, 18 December 2011 (EST) | ||
:No, it is an imaginary policy in the minds of admins here. It falls under "abusing warning privileges" on [[MarioWiki:Warning Policy]] --{{User:B.wilson/sig}} 21:29, 18 December 2011 (EST) | :No, it is an imaginary policy in the minds of admins here. It falls under "abusing warning privileges" on [[MarioWiki:Warning Policy]] --{{User:B.wilson/sig}} 21:29, 18 December 2011 (EST) | ||
== Mhm == | |||
Excuse me B.wilson, but your recent conduct on the wiki has really been...inappropriate to say the least. This is not a warning, this is not coming as a message from the admins. This is a message from me, as it is me who has noticed your attitude problems. Firstly, every time you receive a warning, you ''immediately'' complain about it and explain how you were not in the wrong, or how you did not know it was against the rules, or how this or how that. What it boils down to is basically you being unable to accept the warnings. And then you go ahead and do something like [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:B.wilson&oldid=1191263 this] as a result. | |||
Secondly, your constant complaining about this website's policies is completely unwarranted. We are ''not'' wikipedia, and you need to understand that. We will not have the same policies as wikipedia, even if they are "better for the wiki" (in your opinion) because we are not wikipedia. Wikipedia does not have the best policies of all wikis, they have policies that work for them. And we have policies that work for us. Trying to merge the two together will be met with failure. | |||
Finally your constant insults towards the administration because they "refuse to do anything" is disrespectful and rude. Even not as an administrator, I would know that it is wrong to claim that any user who has faithfully edited this website for over three years (as several members of the administration have) does not care about the wiki. I think you should rather turn around and look at yourself to see if you have a problem. | |||
I realize that you will probably respond to this like you respond to most people trying to talk sense into you - with impolite responses, overreactions and defiance of any err on your part - but this message really does need to get out there. | |||
P.S. Phoenix's warning was perfectly valid, as per [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 23#Remove_Fake_Bans/Warnings|this proposal]]. --{{User:Marioguy1/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 00:04, December 19, 2011
| Archives |
|---|
|
|
If you leave me a message, I will reply here. Please place this page on your watchlist to watch any reply I will make.
I will archive any post within 24-48 hours if I feel the discussion is over (in most cases, if there are no replies within a day or two).
Please feel free to give me reminders or warnings if I made a mistake (especially if it comes to civility) because I will listen to you, of course, if you are civil.
Please leave me a message by clicking here.
Goodbye?
Goodbye? Good luck? Where are you going?
- Wikipedia --Bryce
talk contributions 21:15, 18 December 2011 (EST)
Hey
Long time no see...... Spidey665 21:18, 18 December 2011 (EST)
- Hiya, enjoy editing here. I'm no longer very active here anymore. --Bryce talk contributions 21:26, 18 December 2011 (EST)
Praise
I'd like to read the policy. If you can send me a link to it that'd be great! Spidey665 21:28, 18 December 2011 (EST)
- No, it is an imaginary policy in the minds of admins here. It falls under "abusing warning privileges" on MarioWiki:Warning Policy --Bryce talk contributions 21:29, 18 December 2011 (EST)
Mhm
Excuse me B.wilson, but your recent conduct on the wiki has really been...inappropriate to say the least. This is not a warning, this is not coming as a message from the admins. This is a message from me, as it is me who has noticed your attitude problems. Firstly, every time you receive a warning, you immediately complain about it and explain how you were not in the wrong, or how you did not know it was against the rules, or how this or how that. What it boils down to is basically you being unable to accept the warnings. And then you go ahead and do something like this as a result.
Secondly, your constant complaining about this website's policies is completely unwarranted. We are not wikipedia, and you need to understand that. We will not have the same policies as wikipedia, even if they are "better for the wiki" (in your opinion) because we are not wikipedia. Wikipedia does not have the best policies of all wikis, they have policies that work for them. And we have policies that work for us. Trying to merge the two together will be met with failure.
Finally your constant insults towards the administration because they "refuse to do anything" is disrespectful and rude. Even not as an administrator, I would know that it is wrong to claim that any user who has faithfully edited this website for over three years (as several members of the administration have) does not care about the wiki. I think you should rather turn around and look at yourself to see if you have a problem.
I realize that you will probably respond to this like you respond to most people trying to talk sense into you - with impolite responses, overreactions and defiance of any err on your part - but this message really does need to get out there.
P.S. Phoenix's warning was perfectly valid, as per this proposal. --
( | )
