Talk:Johnson (Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door): Difference between revisions
Mario4Ever (talk | contribs) m (→Comments) |
(→Merge to Implied Characters: Proposal has passed) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Merge to Implied Characters == | == Merge to Implied Characters == | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
Sure he has a name, but that could have been any X-Naut there. I don't think this Johnson should have his own article. The reason the Koopa Johnson should have an article is because he was ACTUALLY seen as opposed to this Johnson who looked identical to the tons of other X-Nauts there. | <span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">MERGE 10-7</span> | ||
{{scrollbox|Sure he has a name, but that could have been any X-Naut there. I don't think this Johnson should have his own article. The reason the Koopa Johnson should have an article is because he was ACTUALLY seen as opposed to this Johnson who looked identical to the tons of other X-Nauts there. | |||
'''Proposer''':{{User|Tails777}}<br> | '''Proposer''':{{User|Tails777}}<br> | ||
| Line 59: | Line 61: | ||
@Mario4Ever: I don't mean to be rude in anyway when I say this (just proving a point) But which of the X-Nauts there was Johnson. Sure he has a name but we don't know which one of the tons of X-Nauts was Johnson. I understand your point of how he doesn't differ from the other X-Nauts but my point is since we don't know which in particular X-Naut is Johnson, therefore I don't think he should have his own article. {{User|Tails777}} | @Mario4Ever: I don't mean to be rude in anyway when I say this (just proving a point) But which of the X-Nauts there was Johnson. Sure he has a name but we don't know which one of the tons of X-Nauts was Johnson. I understand your point of how he doesn't differ from the other X-Nauts but my point is since we don't know which in particular X-Naut is Johnson, therefore I don't think he should have his own article. {{User|Tails777}} | ||
:''The List of Implied Characters is a list of characters that have not physically appeared in any form of media up to this point in time.'' There's a difference between not being distinguishable from other X-Nauts and not physically appearing. As long as he physically appears (and he does, since Crump's not talking to himself), he's not implied. {{User:Mario4Ever/sig}} | :''The List of Implied Characters is a list of characters that have not physically appeared in any form of media up to this point in time.'' There's a difference between not being distinguishable from other X-Nauts and not physically appearing. As long as he physically appears (and he does, since Crump's not talking to himself), he's not implied. {{User:Mario4Ever/sig}} | ||
}} | |||
Revision as of 17:25, September 27, 2011
I know he haves a name and all... but don't 'ya thinks he's perhap a bit too minor to have an article? All he do is get mentioned by Lord Crump at the beggining of PM: TTYD. He doesn't have any characteristic that separate him from the average X-Naut , no plot involvement and you don't fight him in battle. All the above also applies to Johnson (Koopa). --Blitzwing 18:10, 14 February 2008 (EST)
- I agree. He doesn't even say ANYTHING. My Bloody Valentine
- Yeah, he's so minor that he was even added to The List of Implied Charactersat one point. --Blitzwing 18:27, 14 February 2008 (EST)
- But he's not implied. He has an official name and all so he deserves his own article, for now. Paper Jorge ( Talk·Contributions)·
- The Koopa Johnson is not implied, since we can directly tell who he is. The X-Naut Johnson is implied because even though we know he looks like an ordinary X-Naut, we can never really tell which X-Naut he is. He is never separated from the other enemy X-Nauts. The only implied characters that stay as articles are ones that have high story/sub-story significance, like King Croacus (sp?) or the Chestnut King. Knife (talk) 18:50, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
Well the true. Ambidextria
I don't support a merge. He is an officially named character. Plus this is simply a cool article. -- Son of Suns (talk)
- The majority here supported a merge though. Isn't this the way talk page discussions are solved? Just like proposals are? — Stooben Rooben 00:12, 20 January 2009 (EST)
- Per St00by. Nobody even commented right now, so we should have a thorough discussion about why or why not we should merge. uper-Yoshi
- Per St00by. Nobody even commented right now, so we should have a thorough discussion about why or why not we should merge. uper-Yoshi
If no one objects to the action, it can be done. But I obviously object. You can however call a vote and after a week, depending on the results, actions can be taken. But there has to be an actual vote, not just discussion points. -- Son of Suns (talk)
This is supossed to be the Ultimite Mario Database so we need all Mario Information Minor or not and that includes Johnson. User:Mario freak
Merge to Implied Characters
Template:SettledTPP MERGE 10-7
