MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/27: Difference between revisions
Reddragon19k (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 506: | Line 506: | ||
Just Google MLA Standards sonny ;) {{User|Plumber}} 01:25, 11 July 2011 (EDT) | Just Google MLA Standards sonny ;) {{User|Plumber}} 01:25, 11 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::All that does is inform people what MLA is; it does nothing to explain exactly what you plan to do according to its standards (there's quite a lot of info, as you can see when clicking on the above link of mine). {{User|Mario4Ever}} | ::::All that does is inform people what MLA is; it does nothing to explain exactly what you plan to do according to its standards (there's quite a lot of info, as you can see when clicking on the above link of mine). {{User|Mario4Ever}} | ||
}} | |||
===Cover Mario Knockoffs=== | |||
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DON'T COVER 1-20</span> | |||
The Super Mario Wiki is a place where everything Mario should be covered. I have checked and we have done well. However, we have only covered the licensed things (as far as I know). The ''un''licensed things have not been touched. I am talking about knockoff games. Games like Mobario, the mobile "Mario" game for phones and the Great Giana Sisters, the peculiar platform game about two punk girls named Giana and Maria. Since we are the Mario wiki, we should cover '''everything''' Mario, licensed or not. | |||
{{scrollbox|content= | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Magikrazy51}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': July 25, 2011, 23:59 GMT. | |||
====Support==== | |||
#{{User|Toadbert101}} I really dont see what the harm in giving them a short paragraph or so on a page called "Mario knock offs" or something would do. And quite honestly, why are people in oppose so angry? Really, its not going to harm anything. Its getting more information on mario-related things that exists out there for the MARIO DATABASE here. | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} no we shouldnt cover anything that wasnt made, licensed, or published by nintendo cause those things are not official also there was a proposal about this exact thing right here [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_20#Notable_.22Unofficial.22_Games] and it failed miserably so per the arguments in that proposal as well. Also if we cover unlicensed games why not cover flash videos cause they were also based on the mario series. | |||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Including any fanon would undermine our goal of providing our readers with a complete, ''factual'' account of the ''Mario'' series (including its equally official spin-offs and crossovers, and the people and organizations who have made all of that possible). If it's not authorized by Nintendo, we're not writing about it. End of story. | |||
#{{User|Supremo78}} - Like the two above me said, we only talk about the '''officially''' licensed games such as the Banjo series spinned off by Rare. Series that are "knockoffs" we don't cover. If we added them, we really wouldn't be a wiki anymore. | |||
#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - Per all. | |||
#{{User|MeritC}} - No, no, no, no, no, and a million times NO. I don't get upset like this, but this is the Super Mario Wiki for a reason. Knockoffs would ruin the main puropse of why this place is here. So, I say this once again -- NO. And of course, per what the others above me said. | |||
#{{User|Xzelion}} – Per all. | |||
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} No chance in the [[The Underwhere|Underwhere]]. Per all. | |||
#{{User|Magikrazy51}} Per all, I was on a serious ice cream sugar rush when I thought up this. Plus it was 2:00 in the morning and I was very tired. | |||
#{{User|Zero777}} Really? Is this real! How can I say this without being offensive or politically incorrect....... I can't... this is just plain idiotic. Really, just delete this, this will cause chaos. THIS IS MADNESS!! Policy state specifically against this sort of action, so this can be considered ''unconstitutional''. | |||
#{{User|Shadow34}} – NonononoNO. This isn't the Mario Fanon Wiki, it's for OFFICIAL, CANON, and LICENSED material. | |||
#{{User|Glowsquid}} - Per my comment below. | |||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Per my opinion on the link Goomba's Shoe gave. Besides, this is so broad, that even if I made a cruddy game, it would have to be covered. There's millions of fan games based on Mario out there, and it would be pointless to cover them all. This is for official stuff only. Cover fan made stuff and etcetera in other wikis. This isn't the place to do it. | |||
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} - Although this is indeed a bad idea to propose this but this is a... PER EVERYONE!!! | |||
#{{User|Rise Up Above It}} No. Thirty-six times no. There are too many random, crappy and/or obscure fanon games lurking around. This is definitely a proposal that is very untenable. But what about the possibility of adding sections for fan-made products like the stuff found on Etsy under the Merchandise page? Nah, that'll get shot down with just as much vigour as this proposal. | |||
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} If we do that, there would be tons of arguments about what is "worthy" of being covered and what is not. People will be like "oh, I wrote a story about Mario. Let's make an article." We don't need that - anyway we only cover canon stuff to begin with. If I typed something uncanon in an article, it would be reverted. It's the same type of thing, just with a whle article. | |||
#{{User|New Super Yoshi}}Per all. | |||
#{{User|Mariomario64}} – Per all. If it's unlicsensed, it's unofficial. | |||
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} Per '''''all''''' | |||
#{{User|ThirdMarioBro}} If we did this, we would have articles on inappropiate games and animations, like Mario Hardcore and Dumba** Mario, and, therefore, doing this would be detrimental for the wiki. Per all. | |||
#{{User|Superfiremario}} Seriously, this is a wiki on OFFICIAL Mmario things lisenced by Nintendo. NOT a fanon wiki. | |||
====Comments==== | |||
@Magikrazy51: The first three days of a proposal, you can change things to it. Along with that, you can delete your proposal. If you don't like this proposal, you can delete it. {{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} | |||
Why do so many people oppose this when we have [[Animation references|this]] page? - [[User:Mas0n|Mas0n]] 17:38, 18 July 2011 (EDT) | |||
:Those are references to legitimate characters and games, which is different from, say, ''Super Mario Bros. Z'', which uses a hodge-podge of Nintendo and Sega sprites to create an unofficial series. {{User|Mario4Ever}} | |||
::This proposal would likely be doing better if it was written better.[[User:Toadbert101|WHY IS TOADBERT LEAVING A COMMENT]]|[[User talk:Toadbert101|Lol Toadbert101]] | |||
One thing I don't understand is why one opposer is being disrespectful to Magikrazy. You shouldn't be mean to a user just because he has an idea that he thought should be added. {{User|Supremo78}} | |||
:Something else ive noticed is that most of the opposer's reasons for opposing are all terrible and make no sense.[[User:Toadbert101|toadbert]] | |||
::'''@Supremo78''':If you mean Zero, his criticism is not an ''[[wikipedia:Ad hominem|ad hominem]]'' attack; he just disapproves of the proposal. '''@Toadbert101''': How is saying we only cover Nintendo-licensed content a terrible and nonsensical reason, for that is more or less what everyone is saying thus far. {{User|Mario4Ever}} | |||
Actually all of them have the same theme; we don't cover unlicensed games. Other than that, it's a "per all". {{User|Supremo78}} | |||
Covering bootlegs and ripoffs would either result in 1: a truckload of short articles about crappy Famicom hacks with names like Hyper Mario 3D Blast Z 2 clogging up the wiki or 2: an unholy huge list that nobody would actually read (there a ''lot'' of these things). Listing the mind-bending products of Chinese bootleggers is "fun" and "informative" in the same way listing vague storytelling patterns without analysis or context is "fun", but at the end, it's not really useful and after a certain limit, it's just repetitive noise. And that's not getting into fanworks, ''oooooh boy''. | |||
That being said, some of the oppose reasons are really petulant. /seriously/. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] 18:11, 18 July 2011 (EDT) | |||
'''@Toadbert101:''' You shouldn't be supporting this proposal then. Your suggesting something else that could far-fetch out shot maybe, probably not possible, but this proposal has a different idea and outcome. {{User|Zero777}} | |||
[[Hotel Mario]]. Nuff said. {{user|SWFlash}} | |||
:Philips was given the rights to use Mario for that game. It doesn't qualify as a ''Mario'' knockoff, if that's what you're implying. {{User|Mario4Ever}} | |||
::Yeah ''Hotel Mario'' is an official game that was created with the permission of Nintendo {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | |||
@Zero 777: THIS IS THE SUPER MARIO WIKI! Sorry, I just had to get that old joke aside. Anyways, back to my point. | |||
@everyone: What inspired me to make this proposal (aside from the sugar rush and tiredness) was this little story. I was searching the Muppet Wiki for reasons unknown when I came across an article wntitled "Blue Big Bird Knockoff Plush Toys". I searched it and wondered if we had any knockoff articles (BTW, the tag on the toy said "Cookie Monster" for some reason). I searched for both Mobario and The Great Giana Sisters, but no results. So basically, a big blue bird named Cookie Monster told me to do this. {{User|Magikrazy51}} | |||
:Can't you request for it to be deleted? {{User|Yoshiwaker}} | |||
::The SMW shows info on every official thing about the Marioverse, not some knock-offs; I can make a broken program for the crappiest Super Mario Bros. knockoff and it will still be here, that will make it look childish and bad. Chances are that this Muppets Wiki is infact a Wikia, Wikias have a reputation for being unprofessional, unorganized, and straight out dumb looking (no offense to anyone who is a user in one). {{User|Zero777}} | |||
:::[http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Muppet_Wiki You're right], though it doesn't look bad. {{User|Mario4Ever}} | |||
::::It's not professional, but it's not bad for a starter. Magikrazy, why aren't you even supporting your own proposal? {{User|Zero777}} | |||
:::::Because he already admitted it was a stupid idea and he wasn't thinking right when he was creating it. {{User|Yoshiwaker}} | |||
::::::Never eat ice cream at 2 in the morning. {{User|Magikrazy51}} | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 21:38, July 25, 2011
MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive Template
Recipe ImagesLEAVE AS IS 3-7 I've noticed an inconcistency with the images for the recipes. You can even look now at many of them. Many of them are quite alike, but they are different to the others alike. This has caused not only constant headaches with users like myself, but also more work for every user to do. Just go to here and notice how each image is [[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]] for the most part (as some are like .gif and .jpg). This is a great example - for the most part - of what I am talking about. Now go to here or here, and notice how many images are like [[File:<itemname> PM2.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemname>TTYD.png/PNG]], [[File:<nameitem>TTYD.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemnickname>.png/PNG]], [[File:<itemname> SPM.png/PNG]], and then even images for items that are used for more than one game because there isn't a image found! My point I'm trying to come across is that many of our pages have had major work done on them because of this inconsistency, as well as editing them now being a major pain-in-the-neck. Changing them to something that will work out for all of them ([[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]], [[File:<itemname> PM2.png]], and [[File:<itemname> SPM.png]] are what the ideal file names would be), we'll be able to create these pages more efficently, as well as editing further pages be a lot more smoother and less time-consuming. As an example, this is more efficent way of making images easier, as the template already holds the key factors ([[File:PaperMario Items <itemname>.png]]) in it, which would allow the editor just to simply put in the item name. And for the pages that don't use that template, it will still allow easier editing since they would have to only put the key factors and the item name instead of looking up the image and copying it into a page. The downside to all of this is that many of the pages already having these mix-matched file names would need to be fixed and updated to the latest things. Hopefully it won't take much time, and I already have it planned to quickly update each page before it ends up as a project that will take more than a few days. If the proposal pass, I'll start immediately on working, and hopefully have some help to get it down. That is the only downside I can see to this passing afaik. Even if it takes some work, it is better to have consistency then have all this annoying work done if it could be much simplier. Template:Scrollbox Remove Staff PagesKEEP PAGES 2-16 The title explains it all. I feel that the staff pages for the games are not needed in the fact that they are not really about "Mario" himself. We talk about Mario here, not about the people who made the games. People who play the games can know who made the game and all of that kind of stuff. But when we're talking about Mario on the Super Mario Wiki, these staff pages have no business being created. Template:Scrollbox Merge all Donkey Kong sidebar lists with Mario listsMERGE DONKEY KONG LISTS 10-3 This proposal started off as a TPP, which I said the list of Donkey Kong bosses with the Mario bosses list. Goomba's Shoe15 than told me in the comments that we need to merge all other Donkey Kong lists to prevent inconsistency. I liked the idea, and then created this proposal. EDIT: Just to clear up some confusion, I mean the side bar lists such as, Games, Characters, Allies, etc. I don't want to merge the categories. Template:Scrollbox Remove Logos from Infobox TitlesREMOVE 17-4 Quite a few games have logos instead of plain text for their infobox titles, but seeing as the game boxart also contains the logo and is located directly beneath the title, all this really does is show us the exact same graphic twice. This is redundant, and it looks sloppy, especially when the logos are transparent and the background colour interferes with the words. It's also inconsistent, since most games just use good ol' fashioned text. Compare Mario Kart DS with Mario Kart: Double Dash!! - there's no question as to which one looks more professional, and by extension, which style we should use. Other games using the superfluous title-logos include Super Mario Sunshine, Super Mario Galaxy, all three Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games titles, Mario Party 8, Mario Kart Wii and both Super Smash Bros. Melee and Brawl, among others. Then you have the occasional character page with a title-logo, which is completely unnecessary. The only time it makes sense to have logos is for series pages, since a single boxart isn't adequately representative of all the games involved. Some example of this logo usage are Super Smash Bros. (series), Mario Party (series), and Mario Kart (series) (compare with Mario Kart DS), but even then, the logos are being used as the infobox images, not the titles. And, while the consoles don't really the logos in their images, the transparency issue is still a problem, and the inconsistency with other types of pages is also undesirable, so it'd be better of the logos were simply used elsewhere. In short, I propose we remove all instances where the logos are being used for the infobox titles. The logos can be put into the galleries (or incorporated into the body text, as is the case with the character and console pages), so nothing is being lost. Series pages with logos being used as their images will not be affected. Artwork Transparency IssuesREMOVE BAD TRANSPARENT IMAGES 25-20 During the past set of months, I've been noticing that a good number of JPEG artworks were being replaced by PNG artworks with transparent backgrounds. However, a lot of those images look quite ugly when they're viewed in backgrounds that aren't colored white. I've mentioned this dilemma at the admins boards, and some of the Sysops there do agree with my statement. I propose that any artworks with ugly-looking transparency has to lose the transparency. After all, we shouldn't be modifying the artworks by any means; if the artworks are JPEGs, upload them as JPEGs; if the PNG artworks don't have anything transparent, upload them that way. Update: To understand what's going on, please look here for examples of good transparency and bad transparency. Template:Scrollbox Merge the non-game lists on the side bar with the video game listsMERGE SIDEBAR LISTS 8-0 I find it very weird that this wiki considers the non-game elements canon but still keeps them separate on the side bar so i think we should merge the two lists together because if everything is official/canon than they should be on the same list. Because right now the two lists separates the game and non-game elements on these lists and i don't think we should do that. Plus we already merged all of the non-game categories so i think it only makes sense to merge the lists two Template:Scrollbox Reform MarioWiki:ProposalsLEAVE AS IS 11-20 As two old users, we jointly feel that the decision-making system pre-MarioWiki:Proposals was superior to the current system. The current system of MarioWiki:Proposals is based upon popularity contests. The previous system involved discussion on the Community Portal and Talk:Main page. This new proposal would restore any potential problems to be discussed on Talk:Main page, not with "support" and "oppose" columns, but genuine ”bona fide” arguments and discussion. When consensus has been reached, the fate of the "proposal" will be decided. This was the way the system worked before the infamous and perfidious troll A Link to the Past (talk) tricked Porplemontage (talk) and Wayoshi (talk) into creating the proposals (only after his disastrous MarioWiki:Peer Review scheme had failed; Proposals were made largely as a concession to his whining). If this measure passes, it shall go into force July 17, 2011, although any Proposals that still need to expire will be left to expire at their natural time. EDIT: MarioWiki:Proposals will still serve as the main place for talk page proposals. Many thanks to Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) for bringing that up. MLA FormatLEAVE AS IS 2-13 All articles should be written with the most updated version of MLA Format. This will help in the eternal preservation of always citing your sources. Cover Mario KnockoffsDON'T COVER 1-20 The Super Mario Wiki is a place where everything Mario should be covered. I have checked and we have done well. However, we have only covered the licensed things (as far as I know). The unlicensed things have not been touched. I am talking about knockoff games. Games like Mobario, the mobile "Mario" game for phones and the Great Giana Sisters, the peculiar platform game about two punk girls named Giana and Maria. Since we are the Mario wiki, we should cover everything Mario, licensed or not. |