Talk:Giant Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
(Trying to maintain this on all passed TPPs.) |
m (→Merge Giant Donkey Kong to Donkey Kong: Add space to avoid template redirect) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles. | Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles. | ||
{{ | {{scroll box| | ||
'''Proposer''': {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': 2 April 2011 23:59 (GMT) | '''Deadline''': 2 April 2011 23:59 (GMT) |
Revision as of 05:48, October 1, 2011
Merge with Donkey Kong, please. We didn't keep the Giant Kirby article, so we can't keep this... I think. My Bloody Valentine
I think we should keep it. Giant DK is a boss, not a simple effect of the Super Mushroom, like Giant Link or Giant Roy. About the Giant Kirby article, it should also be written since he's a boss as well. --Xeze 07:15, 6 February 2008 (EST)
As Xeze said, he's a boss. Even though this is a different form of DK, I think it should stay separate because of the distinctiveness of the subject in discussion. — Stooben Rooben But that's just my opinion.
Per SR. HyperToad
We should keep it, however, we will be forced to recreate the Giant Kirby article too. 22:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
Should we mention the Giant DK in DK '94? The article for Giant Bowser mentions other appearances in games aside from Smash. --The Qu 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Merge Giant Donkey Kong to Donkey Kong
Template:SettledTPP MERGE GIANT DONKEY KONG TO DONKEY KONG 15-0
Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles.
Proposer: BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Merge
Keep SplitCommentsOne question. What should we do, in terms of Bowser and Giant Bowser. If Donkey Kong and Giant Donkey Kong are merged, shouldn't Bowser and Giant Bowser be too? Obviously this would require a new proposal. M&SG (talk) 09:01, 20 March 2011 (EDT)
so if Giant Donkey kong and donkey kong are the same than shouldnt we merge all the mario forms since there just mario powered up like giant donkey kong might be? Iggykoopa (talk)
Yeah but giant form doesn't pertain to only Donkey kong and what does prominence have to do with this it sounds to me like your picking and choosing when to follow your own rules all the forms are one in the same there still the same characters and there not the same character since you could fight it as donkey kong Iggykoopa (talk)
im sorry it's just i get confused because people on this wiki are constantly using different logic on proposals than using the total opposite of that in a different proposal that has the same sort of flow Iggykoopa (talk) |