Talk:Penguin: Difference between revisions
Booderdash (talk | contribs) |
m (→Sub-/Related Species: Resolved.) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Sub-/Related Species== | ==Sub-/Related Species== | ||
What exactly is the logic behind which penguin enemies are listed as "sub-species" and which ones are "related species"? Why is Cooligan, for instance, a sub-species of penguin while Pendril is merely related? Is a Pendril somehow less of a penguin than a Cooligan? I'm confused :|--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:07, 26 April 2010 (EDT) | What exactly is the logic behind which penguin enemies are listed as "sub-species" and which ones are "related species"? Why is Cooligan, for instance, a sub-species of penguin while Pendril is merely related? Is a Pendril somehow less of a penguin than a Cooligan? I'm confused :|--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:07, 26 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
:FourPaperHeroes has been adding speculative related species to speculative articles, like Penguin and [[Dragon]]. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | :FourPaperHeroes has been adding speculative related species to speculative articles, like Penguin and [[Dragon]]. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ||
::None of them is confirmed to be a sub-species. Should any penguin-like species really be included under "related species"? But anyway, isn't "related species" based on personal opinion? I could say that anything that resembles an octopus or squid is related to Blooper just because of their appearance. Do I have proof? No. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 20:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | ::None of them is confirmed to be a sub-species. Should any penguin-like species really be included under "related species"? But anyway, isn't "related species" based on personal opinion? I could say that anything that resembles an octopus or squid is related to Blooper just because of their appearance. Do I have proof? No. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 20:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:26, October 17, 2012
- Bumpties are better. ^_^--Dreyfus2006 23:19, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
That can be debated. ^_^ 
23:42, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
Forum please. Oh, and Bumpties are way more FTWer than Penguins, no offense.Knife (talk) 23:50, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
- Yeah, you tell him... Wait, there's a forum!?--Dreyfus2006 00:37, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
Penguin vs Bumpty Discussion
Alright, the debate is now here. Thanks for pointing the forum out, by the by.--Dreyfus2006 00:57, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
Trivia
I don't think the part about them being related to Bumpties is needed... Mr. Guy the Guy
...
The Adventures of SMB3
Shouldn't this be under a different section?
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fg (talk).
Sub-/Related Species
What exactly is the logic behind which penguin enemies are listed as "sub-species" and which ones are "related species"? Why is Cooligan, for instance, a sub-species of penguin while Pendril is merely related? Is a Pendril somehow less of a penguin than a Cooligan? I'm confused :|--vellidragon 17:07, 26 April 2010 (EDT)
- FourPaperHeroes has been adding speculative related species to speculative articles, like Penguin and Dragon. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- None of them is confirmed to be a sub-species. Should any penguin-like species really be included under "related species"? But anyway, isn't "related species" based on personal opinion? I could say that anything that resembles an octopus or squid is related to Blooper just because of their appearance. Do I have proof? No. --Grandy02 20:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
