Talk:Bullet Blitzer: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(I believe we should keep this page. If we delete it, people who care about it lose something. What does anyone gain from this article's deletion? I think just because some people aren't interested enough in the article, that doesn't mean it should be up for deletion. (Does this count as necroposting?)) |
(→Oppose: same) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
In my opinion, the details of articles like these are what I love most about Mariowiki. The information from this article isn't "filler", it's just information not important to you personally. Imagine if someone would like to draw this for example. The detailed description would surely help at that. I suggest the article stays the way it is. | In my opinion, the details of articles like these are what I love most about Mariowiki. The information from this article isn't "filler", it's just information not important to you personally. Imagine if someone would like to draw this for example. The detailed description would surely help at that. I suggest the article stays the way it is. | ||
Also, the Hop-O-Matic 4000 doesn't have such a dynamic introductory cutscene, detailed design, Carnival Figure and uploaded model, unlike the Bullet Blitzer. {{User:Scarlet Pairo/sig}} 14:07, October 15, 2021 (EDT) | Also, the Hop-O-Matic 4000 doesn't have such a dynamic introductory cutscene, detailed design, Carnival Figure and uploaded model, unlike the Bullet Blitzer. {{User:Scarlet Pairo/sig}} 14:07, October 15, 2021 (EDT) | ||
:Per Scarlet Pario, this is a relevant ''Mario'' subject -- it just needs to cut down on its writing [[User:Results May Vary|Results May Vary]] ([[User talk:Results May Vary|talk]]) 22:06, October 31, 2021 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 21:06, October 31, 2021
Debate concerning deletion[edit]
Support[edit]
Why do we have an article about a machine appearing in one minigame and as a Carnival Figure? I don't see the point in this article.
Mario-HOHO! (Talk / Stalk) 23:39, 1 May 2013 (EDT)
- Plus, this article is mostly padding. It talks about what happens in the aforementioned minigame rather than the vehicle itself. This article is like making an article for the Hop-O-Matic 4000. It's redundant, pointless, and stupid. Ray Trace(T|C) 00:30, 2 May 2013 (EDT)
Oppose[edit]
In my opinion, the details of articles like these are what I love most about Mariowiki. The information from this article isn't "filler", it's just information not important to you personally. Imagine if someone would like to draw this for example. The detailed description would surely help at that. I suggest the article stays the way it is. Also, the Hop-O-Matic 4000 doesn't have such a dynamic introductory cutscene, detailed design, Carnival Figure and uploaded model, unlike the Bullet Blitzer. ☆Scarlet Pairo☆ talk 14:07, October 15, 2021 (EDT)
- Per Scarlet Pario, this is a relevant Mario subject -- it just needs to cut down on its writing Results May Vary (talk) 22:06, October 31, 2021 (EDT)