MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Badge: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(You read my mind! Sort of.) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all. | #{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Well, it seems I'm not the only one with serious doubts about this article's featured status. Per all. | #{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Well, it seems I'm not the only one with serious doubts about this article's featured status. Per all. | ||
#{{User|Keyblade Master}} Seems like low quality to me if that same template has been there for two years. | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Revision as of 21:02, January 23, 2021
Badge
Remove featured article status
- Ray Trace (talk) Main reason I'm nominating to unfeature this is the two-year old more images improvement template on there that hasn't been addressed yet, so I'm calling attention to that. In addition, the article has suffered a major overhaul since it passed, as it used to be a complete list of all badges in the series until the list of badges got split off: this has made me have second thoughts if it is still worthy of being the best the wiki has to offer. If people disagree, then fine with that, but as long as the improvement tag on the article remains, this should not be featured.
- Doomhiker (talk) With most badges split off, there's not much in here that makes it anything exceptional. In addition, the image template would prevent it from being FA worthy even if it was longer.
- AwdryFan1997 (talk) Per all. I'm allowed to say that here, right?
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
- Archivist Toadette (talk) Well, it seems I'm not the only one with serious doubts about this article's featured status. Per all.
- Keyblade Master (talk) Seems like low quality to me if that same template has been there for two years.
