Talk:Giant Bowser: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:39, February 6, 2008

Is this article's title conjectural? I know the SSBM deal makes it at least part conjecture... YELLOW YOSHI 398

Did you say "Part Conjecture"?
I am Confused 22:19, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

You know, half conjecture; half not. There's a whole template for that. YELLOW YOSHI 398

Um... Merge with Bowser??? Max2 (talk)

I definitly say merge...... - Ultimatetoad

Yeah, merging it with Bowser would make a lot of sense. Keep the screenshot though :P - My Bloody Valentine

If it's a conjectural form, then it should be merged. ^Plumber 15:16, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

I'd have to disagee with the merge. Hope I'm not becoming A Link to the Past.

Paper Jorge! I give paper cuts so stand back!

I'd say merge. But then again, we do have Giant Baby Bowser.Knife (talk) 17:20, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:20, August 20, 2007 (edit) Knife (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:39, February 6, 2008 (edit) (undo) Crocodile Dippy (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I'd say merge. But then again, we do have [[Giant Baby Bowser]].{{User:SpikeKnifeNeedleSword/sig}} 17:20, 20 August 2007 (EDT)		I'd say merge. But then again, we do have [[Giant Baby Bowser]].{{User:SpikeKnifeNeedleSword/sig}} 17:20, 20 August 2007 (EDT)

			I request a merge with [[Bowser]]! {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}