MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Blooper: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Yoshi876 moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Blooper to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Blooper: Nomination failed) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{ | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=15:18, 4 April 2014 (EST) | |nominated=15:18, 4 April 2014 (EST) | ||
| | |lastedit=20:18, 4 May 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
@Stonehill: Well, that vote is going to be automatically removed once that vote is removed... but IF more than one user, including a friggin' "admin", votes to remove that vote. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:33, 22 May 2014 (EDT) | @Stonehill: Well, that vote is going to be automatically removed once that vote is removed... but IF more than one user, including a friggin' "admin", votes to remove that vote. {{User:Mario/sig}} 15:33, 22 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
[[Category:FA failure archives|B]] |
Revision as of 03:38, June 4, 2014
Blooper
Support
- bluetoad63 (talk) No flowery stuff, nothing "captain obvious" like, and of good length. Only thing is the stub section, which can be expanded easily without padding, I think.
Oppose
Baby Luigi (talk) Section-stub at DDR Mario Mix. Can't have that. Bloopers DO have a gameplay function and play a role in the story.Mario (talk) At a glance, there are too many one-liner sections which can be merged into one section. Also, the "general information" section can be expanded. "Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story" can provide more details about the Blooper subspecies, but just a bit more. Also, the stub template is there and some sections violate the Empty Section policy. I don't think it's quite fit to be featured yet.- Vommack (talk)Numerous one-liners, in addition to the stub section.
- Fandro (talk) Per Mario and Vommack.
Removal of Opposes
- Vommack
- Mario (talk) The one-liners are reduced to a more reasonable amount, and the stub section has been sufficiently expanded. Your vote is now invalid.
- Fandro
Comments
I'm pretty sure most, if not all, problems are fixed, but considering the inactivity of this nomination, I think I'm going to renominate this the month after it fails (which is such a long time). Or, I can just ignore the damn rules. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:01, 16 May 2014 (EDT)
@Stonehill: Well, that vote is going to be automatically removed once that vote is removed... but IF more than one user, including a friggin' "admin", votes to remove that vote. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:33, 22 May 2014 (EDT)